ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022
Effect of changes in the menstrual cycle and age on the signal intensity of amide proton transfer imaging in the normal uterus: a preliminary study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the effect of changes in the menstrual cycle and age on the signal intensity of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in normal uterine structures.
methodsThirty-one healthy females (age: 21-50 years old) underwent regular pelvic MRI and APT sequences during their menstrual cycle. The APT values of the endometrium, myometrium, and junctional zone were measured. One-way and multi-way analyses of variance were used to analyze the data. Intraindividual difference and Pearson's correlation analyses were also conducted.
resultsThe APT values of the uterine structures during the menstrual, proliferative, and secretory phases were 3.413 ± 0.682%, 4.776 ± 0.829%, and 5.218 ± 0.772% for the endometrium; 2.966 ± 0.533%, 3.597 ± 0.380%, and 4.324 ± 0.583% for the myometrium; and 1.703 ± 0.393%, 2.362 ± 0.486%, and 2.779 ± 0.528% for the junctional zone. The individual variation in the APT values of the normal uterus during the three menstrual phases was 1.1-1.7%.There were no significant differences in APT values of uterine structures with age. The APT values of the endometrium were greater than those of other structures (P < 0.05).The Pearson correlation coefficients between APT values of uterine structures and menstrual cycle were 0.686, 0.743, and 0.684, respectively.
conclusionThe menstrual cycle had a significant effect on the APT signal intensities of the uterine structures, whereas premenopausal age had no significant effect. Changes in the uterine structures during the menstrual cycle should be considered when using APT to diagnose suspected uterine lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.