ArticleGenome research2022
Surveying mutation density patterns around specific genomic features.
Article in Genome research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of chromosome ends in meiotic stability, recombination and wheat evolution in the context of breeding.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Mapping of Autonomously Replicating Sequences in the Marine Diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Prognostic analysis of mutated genes and insight into effects of DNA damage and repair on mutational strand asymmetries in gastric cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Pan-Cancer Mutation Density Patterns in Enhancer RNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Strand asymmetries across genomic processes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Mutation density analyses on long noncoding RNA reveal comparable patterns to protein-coding RNA and prognostic value.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutation density patterns reveal unique biological properties of specific genomic regions and shed light on the mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Although previous studies reported insightful mutation density patterns associated with certain genomic regions such as transcription start sites and DNA replication origins, a tool that can systematically investigate mutational spatial patterns is still lacking. Thus, we developed MutDens, a bioinformatic tool for comprehensive analysis of mutation density patterns around genomic features, namely, genomic positions, in humans and model species. By scanning the bidirectional vicinity regions of given positions, MutDens systematically characterizes the mutation density for single-base substitution mutational classes after adjusting for total mutation burden and local nucleotide proportion. Analysis results using MutDens not only verified the previously reported transcriptional strand bias around transcription start sites and replicative strand bias around DNA replication origins, but also identified novel mutation density patterns around other genomics features, such as enhancers and retrotransposon insertion polymorphism sites. To our knowledge, MutDens is the first tool that systematically calculates, examines, and compares mutation density patterns, thus providing a valuable avenue for investigating the mutational landscapes associated with important genomic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.