Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36100309›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Phase I/II clinical trial of a helper peptide vaccine plus PD-1 blockade in PD-1 antibody-naïve and PD-1 antibody-experienced patients with melanoma (MEL64).

Rick Daniel Vavolizza, Gina R Petroni, Ileana S Mauldin, Kimberly A Chianese-Bullock, Walter C Olson, Kelly T Smith, Lynn T Dengel, Kathleen Haden, William W Grosh, Varinder Kaur and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Immunotherapy Assessment: A New Paradigm for Radiologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rick Daniel VavolizzaDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0212-8521
Gina R PetroniDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Ileana S MauldinDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kimberly A Chianese-BullockDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Walter C OlsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kelly T SmithCancer Center and Office of Research Core Administration, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Lynn T DengelDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kathleen HadenDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
William W GroshDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Varinder KaurDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6480-7204
Nikole VarhegyiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Elizabeth M GaughanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Craig L SlingluffDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA cls8h@virginia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6664-4373
University of Virginia Cancer CenterUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Jay William FOX · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
Postdoctoral Training Grant for MDs in Surgical Oncology ResearchT32CA163177 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Craig Lee Slingluff, Allan Tsung · 2011 to 2026
$4.6M
MELANOMA VACCINE FOR HELPER T CELLS COMBINED WITH TARGETED OR IMMUNE THERAPIESR01CA178846 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178846NCI NIH HHS T32 CA163177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA vaccine containing 6 melanoma-associated peptides to stimulate helper T cells (6MHP) is safe, immunogenic, and clinically active. A phase I/II trial was designed to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of 6MHP vaccines plus programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsParticipants with advanced melanoma received 6MHP vaccines in an incomplete Freund's adjuvant (6 vaccines over 12 weeks). Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Tumor biopsies at baseline and day 22 were analyzed by multiplex immunohistochemistry. Primary end points were safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.03) and immunogenicity (ex vivo interferon-γ ELISpot assay). Additional end points included changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and clinical outcomes.

resultsTwenty-two eligible participants were treated: 6 naïve to PD-1 antibody (Ab) and 16 PD-1 Ab-experienced. Median follow-up was 24.4 months. Most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) included injection site reactions, fatigue, anemia, lymphopenia, fever, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, pruritus, and rash. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 3 (14%) participants, which did not cross the study safety bound. A high durable T cell response (Rsp) to 6MHP was detected in only one participant, but twofold T cell Rsps to 6MHP were detected in 7/22 (32%; 90% CI (16% to 52%)) by week 13. Objective clinical responses were observed in 23% (1 complete response, 4 partial responses), including 4/6 PD-1 Ab-naïve (67%) and 1/16 PD-1 Ab-experienced (6%). Overall survival (OS) was longer for PD-1 Ab-naïve than Ab-experienced participants (HR 6.3 (90% CI (2.1 to 28.7)). In landmark analyses at 13 weeks, OS was also longer for those with T cell Rsps (HR 6.5 (90% CI (2.1 to 29.2)) and for those with objective clinical responses. TME evaluation revealed increased densities of CD8

conclusionsTreatment with the 6MHP vaccine plus pembrolizumab was safe, increased intratumoral lymphocytes, and induced T cell Rsps associated with prolonged OS. The low T cell Rsp rate in PD-1 Ab-experienced participants corroborates prior murine studies that caution against delaying cancer vaccines until after PD-1 blockade. The promising objective response rate and OS in PD-1 Ab-naïve participants support consideration of a larger study in that setting.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesMelanomaCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTumor MicroenvironmentVaccines, SubunitCancer VaccinesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorVaccines, SubunitCD4-positive T-lymphocytescombined modality therapyimmunogenicity, vaccineimmunotherapyprogrammed cell death 1 receptor

Identifiers

PMID36100309
PMCPMC9472210
OpenAlexW4295753933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.