Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36100081›Full record

ReviewThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

COVID-19 and isolation: Risks and implications in the scenario of new variants.

Viviane Maria de Carvalho Hessel Dias, Alexandre Ferreira Oliveira, Ana Karolina Barreto Berselli Marinho, Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos Ferreira, Carlos Eduardo Ferreira Domingues, Carlos Magno Castelo Branco Fortaleza, Claudia Fernanda de Lacerda Vidal, Claudia Maria Dantas de Maio Carrilho, Debora Otero Britto Passos Pinheiro, Denise Brandão de Assis and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Viviane Maria de Carvalho Hessel DiasAssociação Brasileira dos Profissionais em Controle de Infecções e Epidemiologia Hospitalar, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, PR, Brazil; Hospital Marcelino Champagnat, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. Electronic address: presidencia@abih.org.br.
Alexandre Ferreira OliveiraSociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Oncológica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ana Karolina Barreto Berselli MarinhoAssociação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Serviço de Imunologia Clínica e Alergia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos FerreiraSociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica/Medicina Laboratorial, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Laboratório Clínico ‒ Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Laboratório Central ‒ Hospital São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo Ferreira DominguesCoordenação Geral de Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho, Ministério do Trabalho e Previdência, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Carlos Magno Castelo Branco FortalezaDepartamento de Infectologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Claudia Fernanda de Lacerda VidalAssociação Brasileira dos Profissionais em Controle de Infecções e Epidemiologia Hospitalar, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (HCUFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Claudia Maria Dantas de Maio CarrilhoHospital Universitário, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Debora Otero Britto Passos PinheiroAssociação Brasileira dos Profissionais em Controle de Infecções e Epidemiologia Hospitalar, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Denise Brandão de AssisDivisão de Infecção Hospitalar/Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica Prof. Alexandre Vranjac/Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo Alexandrino MedeirosSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Disciplina de Infectologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Karen Mirna Loro MorejónSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Leonardo WeissmannSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Instituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (UNAERP), Guarujá, SP, Brazil.
Lessandra MichelinSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS), Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Marcelo CarneiroAssociação Brasileira dos Profissionais em Controle de Infecções e Epidemiologia Hospitalar, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação Promoção da Saúde, Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC), Hospital Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Maria Dolores Santos da Purificação NogueiraAgência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Priscila Rosalba Domingos de OliveiraSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rafael Junqueira BuralliCoordenação Geral de Saúde do Trabalhador, Departamento de Saúde Ambiental, do Trabalhador e Vigilância das Emergências em Saúde Pública, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Raquel Silveira Bello StucchiSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Clínica Médica, Área de Infectologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Rodrigo Schrage LinsSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Naval Marcílio Dias, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Silvia Figueiredo CostaSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alberto ChebaboSociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of new variants of SARS-CoV-2, questions about transmissibility, vaccine efficacy, and impact on mortality are important to support decision-making in public health measures. Modifications related to transmissibility combined with the fact that much of the population has already been partially exposed to infection and/or vaccination, have stimulated recommendations to reduce the isolation period for COVID-19. However, these new guidelines have raised questions about their effectiveness in reducing contamination and minimizing impact in work environments. Therefore, a collaborative task force was developed to review the subject in a non-systematic manner, answering questions about SARS-CoV-2 variants, COVID-19 vaccines, isolation/quarantine periods, testing to end the isolation period, and the use of masks as mitigation procedures. Overall, COVID-19 vaccines are effective in preventing severe illness and death but are less effective in preventing infection in the case of the Omicron variant. Any strategy that is adopted to reduce the isolation period should take into consideration the epidemiological situation of the geographical region, individual clinical characteristics, and mask for source control. The use of tests for isolation withdrawal should be evaluated with caution, due to results depending on various conditions and may not be reliable.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesHumansQuarantineCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Isolation periodMasksSARS-CoV-2 testingSARS-CoV-2 variantsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36100081
PMCPMC9444891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.