Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36099806›Full record

ArticleHearing research2022

Updates to the guinea pig animal model for in-vivo auditory neuroscience in the low-frequency hearing range.

Pilar Montes-Lourido, Manaswini Kar, Marianny Pernia, Satyabrata Parida, Srivatsun Sadagopan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pilar Montes-LouridoDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Manaswini KarDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Marianny PerniaDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Satyabrata ParidaDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Srivatsun SadagopanDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: vatsun@pitt.edu.

Funding

Supplement to cortical contributions to frequency-following response generation and modulationR01DC013315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ABEL, TAYLOR JOHN, CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
Neural mechanisms underlying vocalization perception in realistic listening conditionsR01DC017141 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SADAGOPAN, SRIVATSUN · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013315NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For gaining insight into general principles of auditory processing, it is critical to choose model organisms whose set of natural behaviors encompasses the processes being investigated. This reasoning has led to the development of a variety of animal models for auditory neuroscience research, such as guinea pigs, gerbils, chinchillas, rabbits, and ferrets; but in recent years, the availability of cutting-edge molecular tools and other methodologies in the mouse model have led to waning interest in these unique model species. As laboratories increasingly look to include in-vivo components in their research programs, a comprehensive description of procedures and techniques for applying some of these modern neuroscience tools to a non-mouse small animal model would enable researchers to leverage unique model species that may be best suited for testing their specific hypotheses. In this manuscript, we describe in detail the methods we have developed to apply these tools to the guinea pig animal model to answer questions regarding the neural processing of complex sounds, such as vocalizations. We describe techniques for vocalization acquisition, behavioral testing, recording of auditory brainstem responses and frequency-following responses, intracranial neural signals including local field potential and single unit activity, and the expression of transgenes allowing for optogenetic manipulation of neural activity, all in awake and head-fixed guinea pigs. We demonstrate the rich datasets at the behavioral and electrophysiological levels that can be obtained using these techniques, underscoring the guinea pig as a versatile animal model for studying complex auditory processing. More generally, the methods described here are applicable to a broad range of small mammals, enabling investigators to address specific auditory processing questions in model organisms that are best suited for answering them.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAnimalsChinchillaFerretsGerbillinaeGuinea PigsHearingModels, AnimalNeuronsRabbitsVocalization, AnimalAuditory cortexBehaviorElectrophysiologyGuinea pigOptogeneticsVocalization

Identifiers

PMID36099806
PMCPMC9922531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.