Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36099549›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2022

Growing Financial Burden From High-Cost Targeted Oral Anticancer Medicines Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer.

Meng Li, Kaiping Liao, I-Wen Pan, Ya-Chen Tina Shih

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng LiDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-7872
Kaiping LiaoDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
I-Wen PanDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-2781-2629
Ya-Chen Tina ShihDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-3864
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Targeted Oral Anticancer Agents: Patterns of Indicated and Off-Label Use, the Associated Factors, and Economic ImplicationsR01CA225647 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Technology Diffusion in Cancer: Geographic Variations, Facilitators, Outcomes, and CostsR01CA207216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207216NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe rapidly rising costs of targeted oral anticancer medicines (TOAMs) raise concerns over their affordability. Our goal was to examine recent trends in the uptake of TOAMs among cancer patients with Medicare Part D, the share of TOAM users who reached catastrophic coverage, and the annual spending on TOAMs in the catastrophic phase.

methodsUsing the 5% SEER-Medicare, we included patients age 65 years and older who had one primary cancer diagnosis between 2011 and 2016. We included person-years where patients were enrolled in a Part D plan for the entire year, did not receive the low-income subsidy at any time of the year, and received anticancer systemic therapies. We estimated the trends in the share of patients who used TOAMs, the percentage of TOAM users reaching catastrophic coverage, and the total and patient out-of-pocket spending on TOAMs in the catastrophic phase in a year.

resultsFrom 2011 to 2016, the uptake of TOAMs among our study population increased from 3.6% to 8.9%. The percentage of non-low-income subsidy TOAM users who reached catastrophic coverage increased from 54.6% to 60.3%. Among those who reached the catastrophic phase, mean total gross spending on TOAMs in the catastrophic phase increased from $16,074 (USD) to $64,233 (USD) and mean patient out-of-pocket spending from $596 (USD) to $2,549 (USD). The mean 30-day total spending increased from $4,011 (USD) to $8,857 (USD), and the mean 30-day out-of-pocket spending from $154 (USD) to $328 (USD).

conclusionThe high and growing burden from TOAMs highlighted the need for reining in drug prices and capping out-of-pocket spending.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMedicare Part DNeoplasmsAgedFinancial StressHealth ExpendituresHumansUnited StatesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID36099549
PMCPMC10166395
OpenAlexW4295755029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.