Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36099538›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2023

Prevalence of chromosomal disorders in cases with congenital heart defect: registry-based study from Denmark between 2008 and 2018.

C Vedel, T D Hjortshøj, D S Jørgensen, A Tabor, L Rode, K Sundberg, C K Ekelund, O B Petersen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prenatal detection and outcome of major heart defects in a country with universal screening.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current and future diagnostics of congenital heart disease (CHD).Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C VedelDepartment of Obstetrics, Center of Fetal Medicine and Pregnancy, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7475-513X
T D HjortshøjDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
D S JørgensenDepartment of Obstetrics, Center of Fetal Medicine and Pregnancy, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
A TaborDepartment of Obstetrics, Center of Fetal Medicine and Pregnancy, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
L RodeDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9080-3389
K SundbergDepartment of Obstetrics, Center of Fetal Medicine and Pregnancy, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
C K EkelundDepartment of Obstetrics, Center of Fetal Medicine and Pregnancy, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
O B PetersenDepartment of Obstetrics, Center of Fetal Medicine and Pregnancy, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8517-4082
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of chromosomal conditions in all fetuses and children with major congenital heart defect (CHD) in Denmark between 2008 and 2018.

methodsThis was a national registry-based study including all singleton pregnancies with a prenatally or postnatally diagnosed major CHD usually requiring surgery within the first year after birth and a due date between July 2008 and December 2018 in Denmark. Data were retrieved from the Danish Fetal Medicine Database (DFMD) and the Danish Cytogenetic Central Register (DCCR) in October 2020. The DCCR contains information on all prenatal and postnatal genetic analyses, including karyotyping, chromosomal microarray, polymerase chain reaction, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. All cases were reviewed by a clinical geneticist, and genetic changes were classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of uncertain significance, likely benign or benign. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were considered to be abnormal. Cases with CHD without any registered chromosomal analysis reported were considered genetically normal. Isolated CHD was defined as a case with major CHD without any other structural malformations detected prenatally or postnatally. Results are given as n (%). Comparisons between isolated and non-isolated cases were performed using logistic regression analysis, and data are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.

resultsA total of 8482 cases with any cardiovascular diagnosis were retrieved from the DFMD. Twins (n = 112) and minor CHD cases (n = 6921) were excluded, resulting in 1449 cases with major CHD. Of the included cases, 918 (63.4%) underwent chromosomal analysis. An abnormal test result was found in 187 cases, giving a prevalence of a chromosomal condition of 12.9% (95% CI, 11.2-14.7%) among all cases with major CHD. The highest prevalence of a chromosomal condition was found in cases with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum and those with truncus arteriosus (both 28.6%), while the lowest prevalence was found in cases with transposition of the great arteries (2.2%) and congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (0%). In isolated cases of transposition of the great arteries, the prevalence of a chromosomal condition was 0.6%. The overall OR for a chromosomal condition in non-isolated cases compared with isolated cases was 2.72 (95% CI, 1.90-3.88).

conclusionsWe found an overall prevalence of a chromosomal condition of 12.9% among cases with major CHD in a national cohort with a high participation rate in first- and second-trimester screening, without employing whole genome and whole exome sequencing. The prevalence of a chromosomal condition varied considerably according to CHD diagnosis and presence of associated extracardiac malformations. These findings are important for prenatal counseling. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Chromosome DisordersHeart Defects, CongenitalTransposition of Great VesselsChildDenmarkFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisPrevalenceRegistrieschromosomal aberrationcongenital heart defectgenetic disorderprenatal screening

Identifiers

PMID36099538
PMCPMC10107356
OpenAlexW4295761975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.