ArticleThe oncologist2022
EGFR Mutations and PD-L1 Expression in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Data From a Single Center in Brazil.
Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and molecular characterization of a large Brazilian lung cancer cohort: a real-world observational study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- <p>Immunotherapy after EGFR‑TKI treatment in advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: Current status and future perspectives (Review)</p>.Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Envafolimab - novel anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in cancer treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Prevalence ofJournal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma in Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Mesoporous Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite Effective for Combined Chemo/Photo Therapy Against Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTargeted and immunotherapies are currently moving toward early-stage settings for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Predictive biomarkers data are scarce in this scenario. We aimed to describe the frequency of EGFR mutations and PD-L1 expression levels in early-stage non-squamous patients with NSCLC from a large, single Brazilian oncology center.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients with NSCLC diagnosed at an early-stage (IB to IIIA-AJCC seventh edition) at Barretos Cancer Hospital (n = 302). EGFR mutational status was assessed in FFPE tumor tissues using distinct methodologies (NGS, Cobas, or Sanger sequencing). PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (clone 22C3) and reported as Tumor Proportion Score (TPS), categorized as <1%, 1-49%, and ≥50%. We evaluated the association between EGFR mutational status and PD-L1 expression with sociodemographic and clinicopathological parameters by Fisher's test, qui-square test, and logistic regression. Survival analysis was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model.
resultsEGFR mutations were detected in 17.3% (n = 48) of cases and were associated with female sex, never smokers, and longer overall and event-free survival. PD-L1 positivity was observed in 36.7% (n = 69) of cases [TPS 1-49% n = 44(23.4%); TPS ≥50% n = 25(13.3%)]. PD-L1 positivity was associated with smoking, weight loss, and higher disease stages (IIB/IIIA).
conclusionThe frequencies of EGFR mutations and PD-L1 positivity were described for early-stage non-squamous patients with NSCLC. These results will be essential for guiding treatment strategies with the recent approvals of osimertinib and immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.