Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36099260›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Transcranial direct current stimulation leads to faster acquisition of motor skills, but effects are not maintained at retention.

Nirsan Kunaratnam, Tyler M Saumer, Giovanna Kuan, Zacharie Holmes, Dana Swarbrick, Alex Kiss, George Mochizuki, Joyce L Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Churning Better Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Outcome with Accelerated Protocols: Understanding the Non-linear Dynamics through Metaplasticity.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nirsan KunaratnamRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tyler M SaumerRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Giovanna KuanFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zacharie HolmesFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dana SwarbrickRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alex KissEvaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
George MochizukiRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joyce L ChenRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1529-0309
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practice is required to improve one's shooting technique in basketball or to play a musical instrument well. Learning these motor skills may be further enhanced by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We aimed to investigate whether tDCS leads to faster attainment of a motor skill, and to confirm prior work showing it improves skill acquisition and retention performance. Fifty-two participants were tested; half received tDCS with the anode on primary motor cortex and cathode on the contralateral forehead while concurrently practicing a sequential visuomotor isometric pinch force task on Day 1, while the other half received sham tDCS during practice. On Day 2, retention of the skill was tested. Results from a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that participants in the anodal group attained a pre-defined target level of skill faster than participants in the sham group (χ2 = 9.117, p = 0.003). Results from a nonparametric rank-based regression analysis showed that the rate of improvement was greater in the anodal versus sham group during skill acquisition (F(1,249) = 5.90, p = 0.016), but there was no main effect of group or time. There was no main effect of group or time, or group by time interaction when comparing performance at the end of acquisition to retention. These findings suggest anodal tDCS improves performance more quickly during skill acquisition but does not have additional benefits on motor learning after a period of rest.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationHumansLearningMotor Skills

Identifiers

PMID36099260
PMCPMC9469971
OpenAlexW4295517439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.