ArticlePloS one2022
Abetting host immune response by inhibiting rhipicephalus sanguineus Evasin-1: An in silico approach.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying potential binding sites for complex formation between Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 and poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026Article
- Mapping the Interactions Among Class IIa Histone Deacetylases and Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2s.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Retraction: Abetting host immune response by inhibiting rhipicephalus sanguineus Evasin-1: An in silico approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Curcumin and Plumbagin Synergistically Target the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway: A Prospective Role in Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A Novel Inhibitor of DKK1/LRP6 Interactions Against the Alzheimer Disease: An Insilco Approach.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-11-11Concerns/Issues about Image · Concerns/Issues about Methods · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Objections by Author(s) · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/177D663012C685EB6BB0A64E17F7F6
- Retracted
Authors and funding
14 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) is the most prevalent tick in the world and a well-recognized vector of many pathogens affecting dogs and occasionally humans. Pathogens exploit tick salivary molecules for their survival and multiplication in the vector and transmission to and establishment in the hosts. Tick saliva contains various non-proteinaceous substances and secreted proteins that are differentially produced during feeding and comprise of inhibitors of blood congealing and platelet aggregation, vasodilatory and immunomodulatory substances, and compounds preventing itch and pain. One of these proteins is Evasin-1, which has a high binding affinity to certain types of chemokines. The binding of Evasin-1 to chemokines prevents the detection and immune response of the host to R. sanguineus, which may result in the successful transmission of pathogens. In this study, we screened potential Evasin-1 inhibitor based on the pharmacophore model derived from the binding site residues. Hit ligands were further screened via molecular docking and virtual ADMET prediction, which resulted in ZINC8856727 as the top ligand (binding affinity: -9.1 kcal/mol). Molecular dynamics simulation studies, coupled with MM-GBSA calculations and principal component analysis revealed that ZINC8856727 plays a vital role in the stability of Evasin-1. We recommend continuing the study by developing a formulation that serves as a potential medicine aid immune response during R. sanguineus infestation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.