Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36099090›Full record

ReviewIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Safety and Efficacy of Re-irradiation With Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Pelvic Recurrence of Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis.

Shintaro Shiba, Masahiko Okamoto, Kei Shibuya, Shohei Okazaki, Daijiro Kobayashi, Yuhei Miyasaka, Tatsuya Ohno

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A perspective on tumor radiation resistance following high-LET radiation treatment.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shintaro ShibaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan; shiba4885@yahoo.co.jp.
Masahiko OkamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Kei ShibuyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Shohei OkazakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Daijiro KobayashiGunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan.
Yuhei MiyasakaGunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan.
Tatsuya OhnoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Gunma University · JPGunma University Hospital · JPHyogo Prefectural Cancer Center · JPShonan Kamakura General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimPrevious evaluation of the safety and clinical efficacy of re-irradiation for pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) and rectal surgery is insufficient. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of re-irradiation with carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer after PCRT. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe reviewed the medical records of patients treated with C-ion RT between August 2011 and December 2021 and analyzed the data of seven consecutive patients. The probabilities of overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were classified using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).

resultsThe median follow-up duration after C-ion RT initiation was 30.9 months. Five patients received 73.6 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)] in 16 fractions, and two patients received 57.6 Gy (RBE) in 12 fractions. All patients completed C-ion RT as scheduled. Two-year estimated OS, LC, and PFS rates after C-ion RT initiation were 100%, 83.3%, and 28.6%, respectively. No patients developed grade ≥3 acute toxicity. Regarding late toxicities, one patient who received Gore-Tex sheets as a spacer before C-ion RT developed grade 3 colon perforation, and then developed a grade 3 urinary tract disorder. One patient developed grade 2 peripheral neuropathy.

conclusionC-Ion RT showed favorable local efficacy with minimal toxicity. C-Ion RT might be an effective treatment option for pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer after PCRT even when re-irradiation of the pelvis is required.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsRe-IrradiationCarbonChemoradiotherapyHumansPelvisRetrospective StudiesCarboncarbon-ion radiotherapypelvic recurrenceradiotherapyRectal cancerre-irradiation

Identifiers

PMID36099090
PMCPMC9463879
OpenAlexW4294904021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.