Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36099013›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2022

Developing a Provincial Surveillance and Support System for Childhood Cancer Survivors: Multiphase User-Centered Design Study.

Jennifer Shuldiner, Nida Shah, Catherine Reis, Ian Chalmers, Noah Ivers, Paul Nathan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer ShuldinerInstitute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2240-6274
Nida ShahChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-4563
Catherine ReisInstitute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-4567
Ian ChalmersPivot Design Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1714-0918
Noah IversInstitute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2500-2435
Paul NathanChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-0871
University of Toronto · CAWomen's College Hospital · CAHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvivors of childhood cancer are at lifelong risk of morbidity (such as new cancers or heart failure) and premature mortality due to their cancer treatment. These are termed late effects. Therefore, they require lifelong, risk-tailored surveillance. However, most adult survivors of childhood cancer do not complete recommended surveillance tests such as mammograms or echocardiograms.

objectiveIn partnership with survivors, family physicians, and health system partners, we are designing a provincial support system for high-priority tests informed by principles of implementation science, behavioral science, and design thinking.

methodsOur multiphase process was structured as follows. Step 1 consisted of a qualitative study to explore intervention components essential to accessing surveillance tests. Step 2 comprised a workshop with childhood cancer survivors, family physicians, and health system stakeholders that used the Step 1 findings and "personas" (a series of fictional but data-informed characters) to develop and tailor the intervention for different survivor groups. Step 3 consisted of intervention prototype development, and Step 4 involved iterative user testing.

resultsThe qualitative study of 30 survivors and 7 family physicians found a high desire for information on surveillance for late effects. Respondents indicated that the intervention should help patients book appointments when they are due in addition to providing personalized information. Insights from the workshop included the importance of partnering with both family physicians and survivorship clinics and providing emotional support for survivors who may experience distress upon learning of their risk for late effects. In our user-testing process, prototypes went through iterations that incorporated feedback from users regarding acceptability, usability, and functionality. We sought to address the needs of survivors and physicians while balancing the capacity and infrastructure available for a lifelong intervention via our health system partners.

conclusionsIn partnership with childhood cancer survivors, family physicians, and health system partners, we elucidated the barriers and enablers to accessing guideline-recommended surveillance tests and designed a multifaceted solution that will support survivors and their family physicians. The next step is to evaluate the intervention in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

cancercancer screeningcancer survivorcancer treatmentchildhood cancer survivordesignechocardiogramlate effectsmammogrammorbiditymortalitysurveillance

Identifiers

PMID36099013
PMCPMC9516377
OpenAlexW4295359576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.