Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36098988›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2022

Building a healthy mouse model ecosystem to interrogate cancer biology.

Ryan Devlin, Ed Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Synergistic modelling of human disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024
    Article
  2. Impactful in disease research: a DMM year in review.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Sharing resources to advance translational research.Disease models & mechanisms · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan DevlinBeatson Institute for Cancer Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2911-5699
Ed RobertsBeatson Institute for Cancer Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8229-1715

Funding

Cancer Research UK A_BICR_1920_Roberts
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent study, Sargent et al. characterise several novel Rag1-/- mouse strains and demonstrate that genetic background strongly influences xenograft development and phenotype. Here, we discuss this work within the broader context of cancer mouse modelling. We argue that new technologies will enable insights into how specific models align with human disease states and that this knowledge can be used to develop a diverse ecosystem of complementary mouse models of cancer. By utilising these diverse, well-characterised models to provide multiple perspectives on specific cancers, it should be possible to reduce the inappropriate attrition of sound hypotheses while protecting against false positives. Furthermore, careful re-introduction of biological variation, be that through outbred populations, environmental diversity or including animals of both sexes, can ensure that results are more broadly applicable and are less impacted by particular traits of homogeneous experimental populations. Thus, careful characterisation and judicious use of an array of mouse models provides an opportunity to address some of the issues surrounding both the reproducibility and translatability crises often referenced in pre-clinical cancer research.

Indexed as

EcosystemNeoplasmsAnimalsBiologyDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMaleMicePhenotypeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36098988
PMCPMC9509886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.