ArticleCancer research2022
Quantitative Micro-Elastography Enables In Vivo Detection of Residual Cancer in the Surgical Cavity during Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
- A wireless and handheld optical palpation imaging probe for use in breast-conserving surgery.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
- Diagnostic feasibility study of stereoscopic optical palpation for breast tumour margin assessment.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Wide-field quantitative micro-elastography of freshly excised human prostate.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Convolutional Neural Networks Enable Direct Strain Estimation in Quasistatic Optical Coherence Elastography.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- A-scan sequence transformers for palpation with optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Intraoperative Supine Breast MRI for Residual Tumor Assessment after Breast-Conserving Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- A co-registration method to validateHeliyon · 2025Article
- Ultrasound elastography: advances and challenges in early detection of breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- A novel stress sensor enables accurate estimation of micro-scale tissue mechanics in quantitative micro-elastography.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Tissue Elasticity as a Diagnostic Marker of Molecular Mutations in Morphologically Heterogeneous Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The State-of-the-Art and Perspectives of Laser Ablation for Tumor Treatment.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Research progress of breast cancer surgery during 2010-2024: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The LMIT: Light-mediated minimally-invasive theranostics in oncology.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Analysis of friction in quantitative micro-elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Compression OCT-elastography combined with speckle-contrast analysis as an approach to the morphological assessment of breast cancer tissue.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is commonly used for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Following BCS, approximately 20% to 30% of patients require reexcision because postoperative histopathology identifies cancer in the surgical margins of the excised specimen. Quantitative micro-elastography (QME) is an imaging technique that maps microscale tissue stiffness and has demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy (96%) in detecting cancer in specimens excised during surgery. However, current QME methods, in common with most proposed intraoperative solutions, cannot image cancer directly in the patient, making their translation to clinical use challenging. In this proof-of-concept study, we aimed to determine whether a handheld QME probe, designed to interrogate the surgical cavity, can detect residual cancer directly in the breast cavity in vivo during BCS. In a first-in-human study, 21 BCS patients were scanned in vivo with the QME probe by five surgeons. For validation, protocols were developed to coregister in vivo QME with postoperative histopathology of the resected tissue to assess the capability of QME to identify residual cancer. In four cavity aspects presenting cancer and 21 cavity aspects presenting benign tissue, QME detected elevated stiffness in all four cancer cases, in contrast to low stiffness observed in 19 of the 21 benign cases. The results indicate that in vivo QME can identify residual cancer by directly imaging the surgical cavity, potentially providing a reliable intraoperative solution that can enable more complete cancer excision during BCS. SIGNIFICANCE: Optical imaging of microscale tissue stiffness enables the detection of residual breast cancer directly in the surgical cavity during breast-conserving surgery, which could potentially contribute to more complete cancer excision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.