Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36098905›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2022

Evaluation of the efficacy of a 2-step etch-and-rinse, 2-step self-etch and 1-step self-etch adhesive systems, in class II primary molars restorations. An one year prospective, randomized clinical trial.

A D Soares, J C Ramos, L C Alves, J L Pereira, F Caramelo, A L Costa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evidence mapping and quality assessment of randomised trials related to molar incisor hypomineralisation.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A D SoaresFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal. ana.dani.soares@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6841-3990
J C RamosÁrea de Medicina Dentária, Av. Bissaya Barreto, Blocos de Celas, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-1092
L C AlvesÁrea de Medicina Dentária, Av. Bissaya Barreto, Blocos de Celas, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
J L PereiraFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4669-8999
F CarameloFaculty of Medicine, Center for Innovation and Research in Oral Sciences (CIROS), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0015-8604
A L CostaFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4102-1719
Instituto Superior Bissaya Barreto · PTAssociation for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the clinical efficacy at 6 months (6 M) and 12 months (12 M) of 3 adhesive strategies (two-step etch-and-rinse; two-step self-etch; one step self-etch) used in composite resin restorations in primary molars.

methodsThis randomized clinical study involved 101 class II restorations in primary molars of 34 children (4-8 years old), distributed by 3 groups according to the 3 tested adhesive systems: GI- Clearfil

resultsThe aesthetic, biological and most of the functional parameters evaluated remained without significant changes over time. Statistically significant differences were only found regarding the "marginal adaptation" parameter at 12 M, with worsening of scores for the three groups (p < 0.001). Comparing the groups, no significant differences were detected between any of the evaluated parameters (aesthetics properties: p = 0.721; functional properties: p = 0.122).

conclusionsAfter a one-year period, the self-etch adhesives tested presented a clinical efficacy similar to the etch-and-rinse adhesive in restoring class II cavities in primary molars. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11458186.

Indexed as

Dental BondingDentin-Bonding AgentsChildChild, PreschoolComposite ResinsDental CementsDental Restoration, PermanentHumansMolarProspective StudiesResin CementsComposite ResinsDental CementsDentin-Bonding AgentsResin CementsAdhesive systemsClinical trialEtch-and-rinsePediatric dentistryPrimary molarsSelf-etch

Identifiers

PMID36098905
OpenAlexW4295338318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.