Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36098836›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2022

Point-of-care HIV and hepatitis screening in community pharmacies: a quantitative and qualitative study.

Inês Figueira, Inês Teixeira, António Teixeira Rodrigues, Ana Gama, Sónia Dias

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of Portuguese community pharmacy and pharmacists in self-care.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Inês FigueiraPublic Health Research Centre (CISP), National School of Public Health - NOVA University Lisbon, Avenida Padre Cruz, 1600-560, Lisbon, Portugal. if.figueira@ensp.unl.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-2530
Inês TeixeiraCentre for Health Evaluation and Research (CEFAR), Infosaúde - National Association of Pharmacies (IS-ANF), Rua Marechal Saldanha 1, 1249-069, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3873-7158
António Teixeira RodriguesCentre for Health Evaluation and Research (CEFAR), Infosaúde - National Association of Pharmacies (IS-ANF), Rua Marechal Saldanha 1, 1249-069, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-9264
Ana GamaPublic Health Research Centre (CISP), National School of Public Health - NOVA University Lisbon, Avenida Padre Cruz, 1600-560, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-6159
Sónia DiasPublic Health Research Centre (CISP), National School of Public Health - NOVA University Lisbon, Avenida Padre Cruz, 1600-560, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-0685
National School of Public Health · GRNational Laboratory for Civil Engineering · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care tests can contribute to earlier diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases, thereby affording the opportunity to prevent chronic stages and the spread to others. As part of the Fast-Track Cities initiative, a pilot study was initiated in community pharmacies in Portugal.

aimTo characterize the individuals choosing to have point-of-care testing or screening for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C, and hepatitis B virus infections in community pharmacies, their risk behaviours and motivations to perform the tests, as well as to understand the facilitators and barriers from the perspective of pharmacists.

methodA quantitative and qualitative study was conducted. A survey was applied to test users in pharmacies between May and December 2019, and three focus groups were conducted with six, four, and five pharmacists involved in the initiative. Qualitative data were analysed according to thematic content analysis.

resultsA total of 210 questionnaires were collected (57.9% response rate). Point-of-care test users were predominantly male, mean age of 35 (± 13.0) years, the majority had higher education level, and 22.8% were born outside of Portugal. Almost half of the users were first time tested and the main reason for screening was unprotected sexual intercourse. Pharmacists identified speed, confidentiality, counselling provided to users, pharmacists' initial training to perform the tests, and trust in the pharmacist as facilitators of these tests. Stigma associated with infections, the procedure, logistical conditions, and the referral process were considered as barriers.

conclusionPharmacies are a screening site with special importance for individuals who are first tested, heterosexuals, and some migrants. Nevertheless, it is necessary to understand and reduce barriers and increase the support to specific groups.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesHepatitis CHIV InfectionsPharmaciesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMalePharmacistsPilot ProjectsPoint-of-Care SystemsProfessional RoleBarriersCommunity pharmacyFacilitatorsPoint-of-care tests

Identifiers

PMID36098836
PMCPMC9469055
OpenAlexW4295396850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.