Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36098400›Full record

ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2022

Integrating cultural evolution and behavioral genetics.

Ryutaro Uchiyama, Rachel Spicer, Michael Muthukrishna

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryutaro UchiyamaNTU-Cambridge Centre for Lifelong Learning and Individualised Cognition, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore639798ryutaro.uchiyama@ntu.edu.sg; https://www.uchiyamaryutaro.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2444-9980
Rachel SpicerDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UKr.a.spicer@lse.ac.ukhttps://www.lse.ac.uk/PBS/People/Rachel-Spicer m.muthukrishna@lse.ac.ukhttps://michael.muthukrishna.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2807-8796
Michael MuthukrishnaDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UKr.a.spicer@lse.ac.ukhttps://www.lse.ac.uk/PBS/People/Rachel-Spicer m.muthukrishna@lse.ac.ukhttps://michael.muthukrishna.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7079-5166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 29 commentaries amplified our key arguments; offered extensions, implications, and applications of the framework; and pushed back and clarified. To help forge the path forward for cultural evolutionary behavioral genetics, we (1) focus on conceptual disagreements and misconceptions about the concepts of heritability and culture; (2) further discuss points raised about the intertwined relationship between culture and genes; and (3) address extensions to the proposed framework, particularly as it relates to cultural clusters, development, and power. These commentaries, and the deep engagement they represent, reinforce the importance of integrating cultural evolution and behavioral genetics.

Indexed as

Cultural EvolutionBiological EvolutionGenetics, BehavioralHumans

Identifiers

PMID36098400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.