Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36097958›Full record

ArticleGlia2022

Control of Ca

Audrey Denizot, Misa Arizono, U Valentin Nägerl, Hugues Berry, Erik De Schutter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Perisynaptic Astrocytic Processes as Communication Hubs and Early Sites of Dysfunction.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intracellular CaBiologia futura · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Neuron-Glial Interactions: Implications for Plasticity, Behavior, and Cognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  13. Astrocyte morphology.Trends in cell biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Probing microdomain CaFrontiers in network physiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Control of CaGlia · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Audrey DenizotComputational Neuroscience Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna-Son, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3336-0163
Misa ArizonoInterdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7726-6531
U Valentin NägerlInterdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6831-9008
Hugues BerryLIRIS, UMR5205 CNRS, Univ Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3470-683X
Erik De SchutterComputational Neuroscience Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna-Son, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8618-5138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the Ca

Indexed as

AstrocytesCalcium SignalingCalciumNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsSynapsesCalciumNeurotransmitter Agentscalcium microdomainscomputational neuroscienceintracellular signalingnano-morphologyreaction-diffusion simulations

Identifiers

PMID36097958
PMCPMC9825906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.