Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36097821›Full record

ArticlePain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2022

Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory compared with traditional measures of disease severity in fibromyalgia.

Fausto Salaffi, Sonia Farah, Claudia Mariani, Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini, Marco Di Carlo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fausto SalaffiRheumatology Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-6831
Sonia FarahRheumatology Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9815-2621
Claudia MarianiRheumatology Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0422-3717
Piercarlo Sarzi-PuttiniRheumatology Unit, Internal Medicine Department, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan University School of Medicine, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-5133
Marco Di CarloRheumatology Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0906-4647
Marche Polytechnic University · ITASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this study was to explore additional evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) in a large sample of subjects with fibromyalgia (FM).

methodsPatients were consecutively enrolled for a cross-sectional assessment comprehensive of three FM-specific measures (the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire [FIQR], the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status [modFAS], and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale [PDS]) and of CSI. To test the convergent validity, the Spearman's rho was used to measure the degree of correlation between the variables CSI and the FM-specific measures. To assess discriminant validity, CSI scores were grouped according to FIQR disease severity states, and differences between these groups studied with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Interpretative cutoffs were established with the interquartile reconciliation approach.

resultsThe study included 562 FM patients, 199 (35.4%) were classified as having central sensitization syndrome (CSI ≥40). CSI was largely correlated with modFAS (ρ = 0.580; p < 0.0001), FIQR (ρ = 0.542; p < 0.0001), and PDS (ρ = 0.518; p < 0.0001). The differences between the CSI scores in accordance with the FIQR were significant (p < 0.000001). CSI cutoffs proposed for FM: 21 between remission and mild severity, 30 between mild and moderate severity, 37 between moderate and severe disease, and 51 between severe and very severe disease.

conclusionThe current study successfully showed additional evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the CSI in FM patients.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System SensitizationFibromyalgiaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesCentral Sensitization Inventorycentral sensitization syndromechronic painfibromyalgiapsychometric validation

Identifiers

PMID36097821
PMCPMC9826291
OpenAlexW4295453555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.