ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2023
Non-Invasive Assessment of Intracranial Hypertension in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Using Computed Tomography Radiomic Features: A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Current applications of radiomics in neurotrauma.Neurosurgical review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess intracranial hypertension in patients with traumatic brain injury non-invasively using computed tomography (CT) radiomic features. Fifty patients from the primary cohort were enrolled in this study. The clinical data, pre-operative cranial CT images, and initial intracranial pressure readings were collected and used to develop a prediction model. Data of 20 patients from another hospital were used to validate the model. Clinical features including age, sex, midline shift, basilar cistern status, and ventriculocranial ratio were measured. Radiomic features-i.e., 18 first-order and 40 second-order features- were extracted from the CT images. LASSO method was used for features filtration. Multi-variate logistic regression was used to develop three prediction models with clinical (CF model), first-order (FO model), and second-order features (SO model). The SO model achieved the most robust ability to predict intracranial hypertension. Internal validation showed that the C-statistic of the model was 0.811 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.691-0.931) with the bootstrapping method. The Hosmer Lemeshow test and calibration curve also showed that the SO model had excellent performance. The external validation results showed a good discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.725 (95% CI: 0.500-0.951). Although the FO model was inferior to the SO model, it had better prediction ability than the CF model. The study shows that the radiomic features analysis, especially second-order features, can be used to evaluate intracranial hypertension non-invasively compared with conventional clinical features, given its potential for clinical practice and further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.