ArticleHuman gene therapy2022
Identification of Broadly Applicable Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors by Systematic Comparison of Commonly Used Capsid Variants
Article in Human gene therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- STARR-CRAAVT: A platform to identify cell type-specific regulatory elements for next-generation gene therapy.iScience · 2026Article
- Dual AAV vectors for efficient delivery of large transgenes.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Mapping administration route-dependent transduction profiles of commonly used AAV variants in mice by barcode amplicon sequencing.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Non-canonical roles of CFH in retinal pigment epithelial cells revealed by dysfunctional rare CFH variants.Stem cell reports · 2025Article
- Tunable dual-AAV sparse labeling of PVFrontiers in neural circuits · 2025Article
- All-in-one AAV-mediated Nrl gene inactivation rescues retinal degeneration in Pde6a mice.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Efficient Rescue of Retinal Degeneration in Pde6a Mice by Engineered Base Editing and Prime Editing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) represent highly attractive gene therapy vectors and potent research tools for the modulation of gene expression in animal models or difficult-to-transfect cell cultures. Engineered variants, comprising chimeric, mutated, or peptide-inserted capsids, have strongly broadened the utility of AAVs by altering cellular tropism, enabling immune evasion, or increasing transduction efficiency. In this work, the performance of 50 of the most used, predominantly published, AAVs was compared on several primary cells, cell lines, and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived models from different organs, including the adipose tissue, liver, lung, brain, and eyes. To identify the most efficient capsids for each cell type, self-complementary AAVs were standardized by digital polymerase chain reaction, arrayed on 96-well plates, and screened using high-content imaging. To enable best use of the data, all results are also provided in a web app. The utility of one selected AAV variant is further exemplified in a liver fibrosis assay based on primary hepatic stellate cells, where it successfully reversed a small interfering RNA (siRNA)-induced phenotype. Most importantly, our comparative analysis revealed that a subselection of only five AAV variants (AAV2.NN, AAV9-SLRSPPS, AAV6.2, AAV6TM, and AAV1P5) enabled efficient transduction of all tested cell types and markedly outperformed other well-established capsids, such as AAV2-7m8. These findings suggest that a core panel comprising these five capsid variants is a universally applicable and sufficient tool to identify potent AAVs for gene expression modulation in cellular systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.