ArticleHeliyon2022
Intratubular penetration capacity of HiFlow bioceramic sealer used with warm obturation techniques and single cone: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of intracanal moisture on dentinal tubule infiltration of a calcium silicate-containing resin-based sealer assessed with confocal laser scanning microscopy.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of the Intratubular Penetration Ability of Two Retrograde Obturation Techniques in Micro-Endodontic Surgical Procedure: An In Vitro Study with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Evaluation the impact of access cavity design and activation of calcium silicate-based sealer with EDDY and XP-Endo Finisher on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Cleanliness and Sealer Penetration of the Root Canal System Following Final Irrigation Using Chelating Agents.European endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Three Different Sealers and Three Various Obturation Techniques.European endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Effect of Obturation Technique on NeoSEALER Flo Bioceramic Sealer Penetration into Dentinal Tubules: A Comparative Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study.European endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Gel Penetration Using Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Passive Ultrasonic Activation After Apicoectomy: An In Vitro Study with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Penetration of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin Sealers Into the Lateral Canals.International dental journal · 2024Article
- Hydraulic (Single Cone) Versus Thermogenic (Warm Vertical Compaction) Obturation Techniques: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Comparative Analysis of Interfacial Adaptation and Depth Penetration of Recent HiFlow versus Regular Bioceramic Sealers in Conjunction with BC Gutta-Percha Points Using Two Different Obturation Techniques-A Preliminary Report of an Ex Vivo Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of tricalcium silicate-based cements: Systematic review and meta-analysis.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Review
- Influence of bioceramic cones on the quality of root canal filling relative to bond strength and adaptation of the adhesive interface.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Effect of continuous chelation on the dentinal tubule penetration of a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer: a confocal laser microscopy study.BMC oral health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the intratubular penetration area of a bioceramic sealer, using continuous wave (CW), vertical condensation (VC) with two different types of gutta-percha (conventional (NG) and bioceramic-coated (BG)) and single cone (SC) technique with BG gutta-percha, in different root thirds. Methods: A total of 150 mature single-root human teeth (including incisors, canines and premolars) were prepared and randomly divided into five groups (n = 30). Teeth were filled using a bioceramic sealer (TotalFill BC Sealer HiFlow ®) and two different types of gutta-percha, with CW and VC techniques, the teeth in the control group were filled with SC technique and BG gutta-percha. The teeth were sectioned and evaluated as one-third portions in each case under a confocal laser microscope. The penetration area measurements were carried out with the Autocad ® programme. Data was analyzed using the one-factor ANOVA test (p < 0.05) and Post Hoc Test (p < 0.05). Results: The ANOVA Test showed significant differences in the penetration areas of the five obturation techniques (P < 0.05). The Post Hoc Test exhibited significant differences in multiple comparisons (P < 0.05). There was more dentinal tubule penetration in the coronal third than in the apical third in all techniques. Conclusions: The intratubular penetration of the bioceramic sealer was influenced by the obturation techniques tested, but not by the different gutta-percha tested. There was more penetration of sealer in the warm obturation techniques than the SC, regardless of the type of gutta-percha used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.