Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36097475›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Intratubular penetration capacity of HiFlow bioceramic sealer used with warm obturation techniques and single cone: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study.

Alberto Casino Alegre, Susana Aranda Verdú, José Ignacio Zarzosa López, Eliseo Plasencia Alcina, Jorge Rubio Climent, Antonio Pallarés Sabater

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto Casino AlegreDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia, Quevedo 2, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
Susana Aranda VerdúDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia, Quevedo 2, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
José Ignacio Zarzosa LópezDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia, Quevedo 2, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
Eliseo Plasencia AlcinaDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia, Quevedo 2, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
Jorge Rubio ClimentDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia, Quevedo 2, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
Antonio Pallarés SabaterDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia, Quevedo 2, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
Universitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the intratubular penetration area of a bioceramic sealer, using continuous wave (CW), vertical condensation (VC) with two different types of gutta-percha (conventional (NG) and bioceramic-coated (BG)) and single cone (SC) technique with BG gutta-percha, in different root thirds. Methods: A total of 150 mature single-root human teeth (including incisors, canines and premolars) were prepared and randomly divided into five groups (n = 30). Teeth were filled using a bioceramic sealer (TotalFill BC Sealer HiFlow ®) and two different types of gutta-percha, with CW and VC techniques, the teeth in the control group were filled with SC technique and BG gutta-percha. The teeth were sectioned and evaluated as one-third portions in each case under a confocal laser microscope. The penetration area measurements were carried out with the Autocad ® programme. Data was analyzed using the one-factor ANOVA test (p < 0.05) and Post Hoc Test (p < 0.05). Results: The ANOVA Test showed significant differences in the penetration areas of the five obturation techniques (P < 0.05). The Post Hoc Test exhibited significant differences in multiple comparisons (P < 0.05). There was more dentinal tubule penetration in the coronal third than in the apical third in all techniques. Conclusions: The intratubular penetration of the bioceramic sealer was influenced by the obturation techniques tested, but not by the different gutta-percha tested. There was more penetration of sealer in the warm obturation techniques than the SC, regardless of the type of gutta-percha used.

Indexed as

Bioceramic sealerConfocal laser scanning microscopySingle coneTubule penetrationWarm gutta-percha techniques

Identifiers

PMID36097475
PMCPMC9463577
OpenAlexW4293565782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.