Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36097168›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2024

Prospective comparison of restriction spectrum imaging and non-invasive biomarkers to predict upgrading on active surveillance prostate biopsy.

Stefan E Eng, Benjamin Basasie, Alfonso Lam, O John Semmes, Dean A Troyer, Geoffrey D Clarke, Abhijit G Sunnapwar, Robin J Leach, Teresa L Johnson-Pais, Lori J Sokoll and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. MultiparametricLa Radiologia medica · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Stefan E EngJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-6507
Benjamin BasasieDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Alfonso LamJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
O John SemmesDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Dean A TroyerDepartment of Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Geoffrey D ClarkeResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4559-6437
Abhijit G SunnapwarDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Robin J LeachDepartment of Cell Systems and Anatomy, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Teresa L Johnson-PaisDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Lori J SokollDepartment of Pathology, Division of Clinical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5130-0060
Daniel W ChanDepartment of Pathology, Division of Clinical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jeffrey J TosoianDepartment of Urlogy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Javed SiddiquiDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Arul M ChinnaiyanDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ian M ThompsonCHRISTUS Santa Rosa Health System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Paul C BoutrosJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. PBoutros@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-7520
Michael A LissDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. liss@uthscsa.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6978-1026

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
The Early Detection Research Network: Data Management and Coordinating CenterU24CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RUTH D ETZIONI, Ziding Feng · 2010 to 2026
$75.7M
TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robin Jean Leach · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
Tissue/InformaticsP50CA186786 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ganesh S Palapattu · 2014 to 2026
$27.6M
Clinical and Analytical Validation of Cancer BiomarkersU24CA115102 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, DANIEL WANYUI · 2005 to 2021
$7.4M
Advancing method benchmarking and data sharing through crowd-sourced competitions in cancer researchU24CA248265 · NCI · SAGE BIONETWORKS · PI BOUTROS, PAUL CHRISTOPHER, VARMA, SUSHEEL · 2020 to 2024
$4.1M
Discovery and qualification of transcriptomic biomarkers for the early detection of aggressive prostate cancerU01CA214170 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHINNAIYAN, ARUL M · 2016 to 2021
$3.3M
Virginia-UCLA-Toronto Biomarker Characterization CenterU2CCA271894 · NCI · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI OLIVER John SEMMES · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Development of Protein Biomarkers in Post-DRE Urine for use in Liquid Biopsy of Prostate CancerU01CA214194 · NCI · EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BOUTROS, PAUL CHRISTOPHER, KISLINGER, THOMAS · 2016 to 2021
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186786NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214170NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214194NCI NIH HHS U24 CA086368NCI NIH HHS U24 CA115102NCI NIH HHS U24 CA248265NCI NIH HHS U2C CA271894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtocol-based active surveillance (AS) biopsies have led to poor compliance. To move to risk-based protocols, more accurate imaging biomarkers are needed to predict upgrading on AS prostate biopsy. We compared restriction spectrum imaging (RSI-MRI) generated signal maps as a biomarker to other available non-invasive biomarkers to predict upgrading or reclassification on an AS biopsy.

methodsWe prospectively enrolled men on prostate cancer AS undergoing repeat biopsy from January 2016 to June 2019 to obtain an MRI and biomarkers to predict upgrading. Subjects underwent a prostate multiparametric MRI and a short duration, diffusion-weighted enhanced MRI called RSI to generate a restricted signal map along with evaluation of 30 biomarkers (14 clinico-epidemiologic features, 9 molecular biomarkers, and 7 radiologic-associated features). Our primary outcome was upgrading or reclassification on subsequent AS prostate biopsy. Statistical analysis included operating characteristic improvement using AUROC and AUPRC.

resultsThe individual biomarker with the highest area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was RSI-MRI (AUC = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96). The best non-imaging biomarker was prostate volume-corrected Prostate Health Index density (PHI, AUC = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53-0.82). Non-imaging biomarkers had a negligible effect on predicting upgrading at the next biopsy but did improve predictions of overall time to progression in AS.

conclusionsRSI-MRI, PIRADS, and PHI could improve the predictive ability to detect upgrading in AS. The strongest predictor of clinically significant prostate cancer on AS biopsy was RSI-MRI signal output.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkersBiopsyHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm GradingWatchful WaitingBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36097168
PMCPMC12356097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.