Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36097023›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Heterogeneous human-robot task allocation based on artificial trust.

Arsha Ali, Hebert Azevedo-Sa, Dawn M Tilbury, Lionel P Robert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Active interaction strategy generation for human-robot collaboration based on trust.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arsha AliRobotics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. arshaali@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6278-6764
Hebert Azevedo-SaRobotics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dawn M TilburyRobotics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lionel P RobertRobotics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1410-2601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective human-robot collaboration requires the appropriate allocation of indivisible tasks between humans and robots. A task allocation method that appropriately makes use of the unique capabilities of each agent (either a human or a robot) can improve team performance. This paper presents a novel task allocation method for heterogeneous human-robot teams based on artificial trust from a robot that can learn agent capabilities over time and allocate both existing and novel tasks. Tasks are allocated to the agent that maximizes the expected total reward. The expected total reward incorporates trust in the agent to successfully execute the task as well as the task reward and cost associated with using that agent for that task. Trust in an agent is computed from an artificial trust model, where trust is assessed along a capability dimension by comparing the belief in agent capabilities with the task requirements. An agent's capabilities are represented by a belief distribution and learned using stochastic task outcomes. Our task allocation method was simulated for a human-robot dyad. The team total reward of our artificial trust-based task allocation method outperforms other methods both when the human's capabilities are initially unknown and when the human's capabilities belief distribution has converged to the human's actual capabilities. Our task allocation method enables human-robot teams to maximize their joint performance.

Indexed as

RoboticsTrustHumans

Identifiers

PMID36097023
PMCPMC9468009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.