Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36096872›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2022

Relationship between ER expression by IHC or mRNA with Ki67 response to aromatase inhibition: a POETIC study.

Elena Lopez-Knowles, Simone Detre, Margaret Hills, Eugene F Schuster, Maggie C U Cheang, Holly Tovey, Lucy S Kilburn, Judith M Bliss, John Robertson, Elizabeth Mallon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Global Transcriptional Complexity of Estrogen Receptor-Low Positive Breast Cancers in the Prospective Swedish Population-Based SCAN-B Cohort.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Elena Lopez-KnowlesThe Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. elena.lopezknowles@icr.ac.uk.
Simone DetreRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Margaret HillsRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Eugene F SchusterThe Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Maggie C U CheangClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Holly ToveyClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Lucy S KilburnClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Judith M BlissClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
John RobertsonGraduate Entry Medical School, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK.
Elizabeth MallonQueen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow, Govan, UK.
Anthony SkeneUniversity Hospitals Dorset (Royal Bournemouth), Bournemouth, UK.
Abigail EvansUniversity Hospitals Dorset (Poole), Poole, UK.
Ian SmithRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Mitch DowsettThe Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBBreast Cancer Now · GBPoole Hospital · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBRoyal Bournemouth Hospital · GBRoyal Derby Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25351Cancer Research UK 8671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical practice, oestrogen receptor (ER) analysis is almost entirely by immunohistochemistry (IHC). ASCO/CAP recommends cut-offs of < 1% (negative) and 1-10% (low) cells positive. There is uncertainty whether patients with ER low tumours benefit from endocrine therapy. We aimed to assess IHC and mRNA cut-points for ER versus biological response of primary breast cancer to 2 weeks' aromatase inhibitor treatment as measured by change in Ki67.

methodsCases were selected from the aromatase inhibitor treatment group of POETIC. We selected the 15% with the poorest Ki67 response (PR, < 40% Ki67 suppression, n = 230) and a random 30% of the remainder categorised as intermediate (IR, 40-79% Ki67 suppression, n = 150) and good-responders (GR, ≥ 80% Ki67 suppression, n = 230) from HER2 - group. All HER2 + cases available were selected irrespective of their response category (n = 317). ER expression was measured by IHC and qPCR.

resultsER IHC was available from 515 HER2 - and 186 HER2 + tumours and ER qPCR from 367 HER2 - and 171 HER2 + tumours. Ninety-one percentage of patients with ER IHC < 10% were PRs with similar rates in HER2 - and HER2 + cases. At or above ER IHC 10% substantial numbers of patients showed IR or GR. Similar proportions of patients were defined by cut-points of ER IHC < 10% and ER mRNA < 5 units. In addition, loss of PgR expression altered ER anti-proliferation response with 92% of PgR - cases with ER IHC < 40% being PRs.

conclusionsThere was little responsiveness at IHC < 10% and no distinction between < 1% and 1-10% cells positive. Similar separation of PRs from IR/GRs was achieved by IHC and mRNA.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsReceptors, EstrogenAromataseAromatase InhibitorsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, MessengerAromataseAromatase InhibitorsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, MessengerAromatase inhibitorsBreast cancerESR1Ki67PgR

Identifiers

PMID36096872
PMCPMC9466340
OpenAlexW4295517391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.