Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36096545›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2023

Trial by "Firsts": Clinical Trial Design and Regulatory Considerations in the Development and Approval of the First AAV Gene Therapy Product in the United States.

Kathleen Z Reape, Katherine A High

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical endpoints special session, ISCEV 2025, Utrecht.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Overview of Retinal Gene Therapy: Current Status and Future Challenges.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathleen Z ReapeSpark Therapeutics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA kzreape@gmail.com khigh@askbio.com.
Katherine A HighSpark Therapeutics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA kzreape@gmail.com khigh@askbio.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the therapeutic potential of supplying a normal copy of a mutant gene to the correct target tissue, gene therapy holds extraordinary promise for the treatment of genetic disease. Like other novel classes of therapeutics however, gene therapies must overcome a range of clinical, regulatory, and manufacturing hurdles to reach regulatory approval. This paper reviews key aspects of clinical trial design, development, and evaluation of a novel primary end point, and regulatory interactions that resulted in the first approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of an adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy product.

Indexed as

DependovirusGenetic TherapyClinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID36096545
PMCPMC10153798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.