Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36096413›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2023

Monkeypox infection in pregnancy: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Francesco D'Antonio, Giorgio Pagani, Danilo Buca, Asma Khalil

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Poxviridae Pneumonia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Monkeypox: Proposals for care in pregnancy].Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francesco D'AntonioCenter for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy (MD D'Antonio and MD Buca).
Giorgio PaganiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy (MD Pagani).
Danilo BucaCenter for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy (MD D'Antonio and MD Buca).
Asma KhalilFetal Medicine Unit, Saint George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom (Dr Khalil); Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom (Dr Khalil); Fetal Medicine Unit, Liverpool Women's Hospital, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom (Dr Khalil). Electronic address: akhalil@sgul.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe World Health Organization has recently declared a monkeypox outbreak as a public health emergency of global concern. The main aim of this systematic review was to ascertain the maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by monkeypox infection. DATA SOURCES: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched on June 25, 2022 utilizing combinations of the relevant medical subject heading terms, key words, and word variants for "monkeypox" and "pregnancy." STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The search and selection criteria were restricted to the English language.

methodsThe outcomes observed were miscarriage; intrauterine, neonatal, and perinatal death; preterm birth, vertical transmission, and maternal symptoms. A metaanalysis of proportions was used to analyze the data.

resultsFour studies were included. All the cases in the present systematic review presented with symptoms and signs of monkeypox infection. There was no case of maternal death. Miscarriage occurred in 39% of cases (95% confidence interval, 0-89.0), whereas intrauterine fetal death occurred in 23.0% (95% confidence interval, 0-74.0) of cases. The overall incidence of late fetal and perinatal loss was 77.0% (95% confidence interval, 26.0-100), whereas only 23% (95% confidence interval, 0-74.0) of the included fetuses survived to birth. The incidence of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation was 8.0% (95% confidence interval, 0-62.0). Vertical transmission occurred in 62.0% (95% confidence interval, 3.0-100) of cases. When stratifying the analysis according to gestational age at infection, fetal loss was found to occur in 67.0% (95% confidence interval, 9.0-99.0) of cases with first-trimester infection and in 82.0% (95% confidence interval, 17.0-100) of those with second-trimester infection.

conclusionMonkeypox infection in pregnancy is associated with a high risk of perinatal loss and vertical transmission. The preliminary results from this systematic review affected by a very small number of included cases highlight the need for thorough maternal and fetal surveillance in pregnancies complicated by monkeypox infection.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousMpox, MonkeypoxPremature BirthFemaleFetal DeathGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousStillbirthmonkey poxoutcomepregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36096413
PMCPMC9555294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.