Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36096370›Full record

SynthesisJournal of affective disorders2022

Prevalence of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 2 million people.

Felipe Mendes Delpino, Carine Nascimento da Silva, Jeferson Santos Jerônimo, Eliete Stark Mulling, Larissa Leal da Cunha, Marina Krause Weymar, Ricardo Alt, Eduardo L Caputo, Natan Feter

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of affective disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe Mendes DelpinoPostgraduate Program in Nursing, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: fmdsocial@outlook.com.
Carine Nascimento da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jeferson Santos JerônimoPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Eliete Stark MullingPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Larissa Leal da CunhaPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Marina Krause WeymarPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Ricardo AltPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Eduardo L CaputoPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Natan FeterPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUncertainty, disruptions in daily routines, and concerns for the health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely associated with increases in generalized anxiety. The present study aimed to systematically review the literature in order to identify the update prevalence of anxiety in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis. It included studies that assessed the prevalence of anxiety among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsIn total, we included 194 studies. The general prevalence of anxiety was 35.1 %, affecting approximately 851,000 participants. The prevalence in low and middle-income countries (35.1 %; 95%CI: 29.5 % to 41.0 %) was similar compared to high-income countries (34.7 %; 95%CI: 29.6 % to 40.1 %). In studies that provided the proportion of cases in each level of anxiety disorder, mild-to-moderate anxiety affected one quarter of the participants. One in ten cases with anxiety during the COVID-19 may be living with severe or extremely anxiety disorder. Most instruments estimated similar prevalence of anxiety disorders with notable difference in the prevalence estimated by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2), Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

conclusionOne in three adults were living with anxiety disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionHumansPandemicsPrevalenceAnxietyCoronavirusCOVID-19Pandemic

Identifiers

PMID36096370
PMCPMC9462928
OpenAlexW4295458982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.