Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36096146›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2023

Initial protection against SARS-CoV-2 omicron lineage infection in children and adolescents by BNT162b2 in Israel: an observational study.

Ofra Amir, Yair Goldberg, Micha Mandel, Yinon M Bar-On, Omri Bodenheimer, Laurence Freedman, Nachman Ash, Sharon Alroy-Preis, Amit Huppert, Ron Milo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ofra AmirFaculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Yair GoldbergFaculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. Electronic address: yairgo@technion.ac.il.
Micha MandelStatistics and Data Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yinon M Bar-OnDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Omri BodenheimerIsrael Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Laurence FreedmanAriel University, Ariel, Israel.
Nachman AshIsrael Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel; Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Sharon Alroy-PreisIsrael Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amit HuppertThe Bio-statistical and Bio-mathematical Unit, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology & Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Ron MiloDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Israel Ministry of Health · ILTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILWeizmann Institute of Science · ILAriel University · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) two-dose vaccine regiment for children and the BNT162b2 third dose for adolescents were approved shortly before the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) outbreak in Israel. We aimed to estimate the effects of these vaccines on the rates of confirmed infection against the omicron variant in children and adolescents.

methodsIn this observational cohort study, we extracted data for the omicron-dominated (sublineage BA.1) period. We compared rates of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between children aged 5-10 years 14-35 days after receiving the second vaccine dose with an internal control group of children 3-7 days after receiving the first dose (when the vaccine is not yet effective). Similarly, we compared confirmed infection rates in adolescents aged 12-15 years 14-60 days after receiving a booster dose with an internal control group of adolescents 3-7 days after receiving the booster dose. We used Poisson regression, adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, calendar week, and exposure.

findingsBetween Dec 26, 2021, and Jan 8, 2022, we included 1 158 289 participants. In children aged 5-10 years, the adjusted rate of confirmed infection was 2·3 times (95% CI 2·0-2·5) lower in children who received a second dose than in the internal control group. The adjusted infection rate in children who received a second dose was 102 infections per 100 000 risk-days (94-110) compared with 231 infections per 100 000 risk-days (215-248) in the corresponding internal control cohort. In adolescents aged 12-15 years, the booster dose decreased confirmed infection rates by 3·3 times (2·8-4·0) compared with in the internal control group. The adjusted infection rate of the booster cohort was 70 per 100 000 risk-days (60-81) compared with 232 per 100 000 risk-days (212-254) in the internal control cohort.

interpretationA recent two-dose vaccination regimen with BNT162b2 and a recent booster dose in adolescents substantially reduced the rate of confirmed infection compared with the internal control groups. Future studies are needed to assess the duration of this protection and protection against other outcomes such as paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 and long-COVID.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentBNT162 VaccineChildHumansIsraelPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeBNT162 Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID36096146
PMCPMC9462831
OpenAlexW4295435192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.