Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36095912›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2022

Evaluating differences in Young's Modulus of regenerated and uninjured mouse digit bone through microCT density-based calculation and nanoindentation testing.

Kevin F Hoffseth, Emily Busse, Michelle Lacey, Mimi C Sammarco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin F HoffsethDepartment of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, Louisiana State University, 149 E.B. Doran Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA. Electronic address: khoffseth@agenter.lsu.edu.
Emily BusseDepartment of Surgery, Tulane School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Michelle LaceyDepartment of Mathematics, Tulane University, 6823 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.
Mimi C SammarcoDepartment of Surgery, Tulane School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. Electronic address: msammarc@tulane.edu.

Funding

The role of the CMV-associated reactive oxygen species in age-relatedP20GM103629 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI ROUT, NAMITA · 2012 to 2021
$22.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse digit tip amputation model is an excellent model of bone regeneration, but its size and shape present an obstacle for biomechanical testing. As a result, assessing the structural quality of the regenerated bone in this model has focused on mineral density and bone architecture analysis. Here we describe an image-processing based method for assessment of mechanical properties in the regenerated digit by using micro-computed tomography mineral density data to calculate spatially discrete Young's modulus values throughout the entire distal third phalange. Further, we validate this method through comparison to nanoindentation-measured values for Young's modulus. Application to a set of regenerated and unamputated digits shows that regenerated bone has a lower Young's modulus compared to the uninjured digit, with a similar trend for experimental hardness values. Importantly, this method heightens the utility of the digit regeneration model, allows for more impactful treatment evaluation using the model, and introduces an analysis platform that can be used for other bones that do not conform to a standard long-bone model.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesBone DensityAnimalsElastic ModulusHardnessMiceX-Ray MicrotomographyBoneDigit regenerationMicro-computed tomographyNanoindentationYoung’s modulus

Identifiers

PMID36095912
PMCPMC9947921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.