Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36095660›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2022

Social networks in the single cell.

Moira Rodriguez, Ana Martinez-Hottovy, Alan C Christensen

Open access · hybridAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moira RodriguezSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Ana Martinez-HottovySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Alan C ChristensenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article comments on: Chustecki JM, Etherington RD, Gibbs DJ, Johnston IG. 2022. Altered collective mitochondrial dynamics in the Arabidopsis msh1 mutant compromising organelle DNA maintenance. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 5428-5439. Plant mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can become damaged in many ways. A major repair mechanism is homologous recombination, which requires an undamaged DNA template. Presumably, this template comes from a different mitochondrion in the same cell. Plant mitochondria undergo fission and fusion to form transient networks which could allow the exchange of genetic information. To test this hypothesis, Chustecki et al. (2022) used msh1 mutants with defective DNA repair, and showed that mitochondrial interactions increased, revealing a link between the physical and genetic behavior of mitochondria.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsDNA, MitochondrialMitochondriaMutS DNA Mismatch-Binding ProteinSocial NetworkingArabidopsis ProteinsDNA, MitochondrialMSH1 protein, ArabidopsisMutS DNA Mismatch-Binding ProteinDNA damageDNA repairmitochondriamitochondrial fusion

Identifiers

PMID36095660
PMCPMC9467649
OpenAlexW4295514002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.