Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36095024›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2022

Whole-exome sequencing reveals a comprehensive germline mutation landscape and identifies twelve novel predisposition genes in Chinese prostate cancer patients.

Yonghao Liang, Peter Ka-Fung Chiu, Yao Zhu, Christine Yim-Ping Wong, Qing Xiong, Lin Wang, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Qin Cao, Yu Wei, Ding-Wei Ye and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AreFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yonghao LiangSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Peter Ka-Fung ChiuS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1499-8372
Yao ZhuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Christine Yim-Ping WongS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Qing XiongSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Lin WangSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9082-2686
Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9361-2342
Qin CaoSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yu WeiDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6817-9076
Ding-Wei YeDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Stephen Kwok-Wing TsuiSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0686-4259
Chi-Fai NgS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most inheritable cancer with approximately 42% of disease risk attributed to inherited factors by studies of twins, indicating the importance of additional genetic screening to identify predisposition variants. However, only DNA damage repair (DDR) genes have been investigated thoroughly in prostate cancer. To determine the comprehensive germline mutation landscape in Chinese prostate cancer patients, we performed whole exome sequencing in 100 Han Chinese patients with prostate cancer in Hong Kong and identified deleterious germline mutations. A total of 36 deleterious germline variants in 25 genes were identified in 29% patients. Variants were found in eight pathways, including DNA methylation, DDR, and tyrosine-protein kinase. These findings were validated in an independent Chinese cohort of 167 patients with prostate cancer in Shanghai. Seven common deleterious-variant-containing genes were found in discovery cohort (7/25, 28%) and validation cohort (7/28, 25%) with three genes not described before (LDLR, MYH7 and SUGCT) and four genes previously reported (FANCI, ITGA6, PABPC1 and RAD54B). When comparing with that of a cohort of East Asian healthy individuals, 12 non-DDR novel potential predisposition genes (ADGRG1, CHD4, DNMT3A, ERBB3, GRHL1, HMBS, LDLR, MYH7, MYO6, NT5C2, NUP98 and SUGCT) were identified using the discovery and validation cohorts, which have not been previously reported in prostate cancer patients in all ethnic groups. Taken together, this study reveals a comprehensive germline mutation landscape in Chinese prostate cancer patients and discovers 12 novel non-DDR predisposition genes to lay the groundwork for the optimization of genetic screening.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationProstatic NeoplasmsChinaExome SequencingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleProtein KinasesTyrosineProtein KinasesTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID36095024
PMCPMC9499300
OpenAlexW4295880250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.