ArticlePLoS biology2022
Blind spots on western blots: Assessment of common problems in western blot figures and methods reporting with recommendations to improve them.
Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of electronic cigarette aerosols on cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer cells: a collaborative replication study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic models from DNA methylation by multi algorithm machine learning.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Pharmacological and Genetic Approaches to Downregulate FIS1 Mitigate Neuropathic Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Targeted and Untargeted Proteomics-based Comparison of Adenoviral Infected hCMEC/D3 and hBMEC as a Human Brain Endothelial Cells to Study the OATP2B1 Transporter.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Integrating thermodynamics and molecular kinetics into western blotting teaching.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Production of monoclonal antibodies against botulinum neurotoxin inHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Article
- Guidelines on antibody use in physiology research.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2024Article
- Brain organoids engineered to give rise to glia and neural networks after 90 days in culture exhibit human-specific proteoforms.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
- Glucocorticoids modulate neural activity via a rapid non-genomic effect on Kv2.2 channels in the central nervous system.Neurobiology of stress · 2024Article
- Article
- Specific, sensitive and quantitative protein detection by in-gel fluorescence.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Effects of sleep deprivation on cognition and synaptic associated proteins in rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Western blotting is a standard laboratory method used to detect proteins and assess their expression levels. Unfortunately, poor western blot image display practices and a lack of detailed methods reporting can limit a reader's ability to evaluate or reproduce western blot results. While several groups have studied the prevalence of image manipulation or provided recommendations for improving western blotting, data on the prevalence of common publication practices are scarce. We systematically examined 551 articles published in the top 25% of journals in neurosciences (n = 151) and cell biology (n = 400) that contained western blot images, focusing on practices that may omit important information. Our data show that most published western blots are cropped and blot source data are not made available to readers in the supplement. Publishing blots with visible molecular weight markers is rare, and many blots additionally lack molecular weight labels. Western blot methods sections often lack information on the amount of protein loaded on the gel, blocking steps, and antibody labeling protocol. Important antibody identifiers like company or supplier, catalog number, or RRID were omitted frequently for primary antibodies and regularly for secondary antibodies. We present detailed descriptions and visual examples to help scientists, peer reviewers, and editors to publish more informative western blot figures and methods. Additional resources include a toolbox to help scientists produce more reproducible western blot data, teaching slides in English and Spanish, and an antibody reporting template.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.