Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36095010›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

Blind spots on western blots: Assessment of common problems in western blot figures and methods reporting with recommendations to improve them.

Cristina Kroon, Larissa Breuer, Lydia Jones, Jeehye An, Ayça Akan, Elkhansa Ahmed Mohamed Ali, Felix Busch, Marinus Fislage, Biswajit Ghosh, Max Hellrigel-Holderbaum and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pharmacological and Genetic Approaches to Downregulate FIS1 Mitigate Neuropathic Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Guidelines on antibody use in physiology research.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Cristina KroonInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Larissa BreuerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) within the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.
Lydia JonesBerlin School of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jeehye AnBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ayça AkanBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Elkhansa Ahmed Mohamed AliDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BuschDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Marinus FislageDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Biswajit GhoshDepartment of Biology, Chemistry, Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Max Hellrigel-HolderbaumBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vartan KazezianQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alina KoppoldInstitute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Cesar Alberto Moreira RestrepoBerlin School of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nico RiedelQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lea ScherschinskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Fernando Raúl Urrutia GonzalezBerlin School of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tracey L WeissgerberQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7490-2600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Western blotting is a standard laboratory method used to detect proteins and assess their expression levels. Unfortunately, poor western blot image display practices and a lack of detailed methods reporting can limit a reader's ability to evaluate or reproduce western blot results. While several groups have studied the prevalence of image manipulation or provided recommendations for improving western blotting, data on the prevalence of common publication practices are scarce. We systematically examined 551 articles published in the top 25% of journals in neurosciences (n = 151) and cell biology (n = 400) that contained western blot images, focusing on practices that may omit important information. Our data show that most published western blots are cropped and blot source data are not made available to readers in the supplement. Publishing blots with visible molecular weight markers is rare, and many blots additionally lack molecular weight labels. Western blot methods sections often lack information on the amount of protein loaded on the gel, blocking steps, and antibody labeling protocol. Important antibody identifiers like company or supplier, catalog number, or RRID were omitted frequently for primary antibodies and regularly for secondary antibodies. We present detailed descriptions and visual examples to help scientists, peer reviewers, and editors to publish more informative western blot figures and methods. Additional resources include a toolbox to help scientists produce more reproducible western blot data, teaching slides in English and Spanish, and an antibody reporting template.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternNeurosciencesProteinsAntibodiesReproducibility of ResultsAntibodiesProteins

Identifiers

PMID36095010
PMCPMC9518894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.