Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36094804›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Home-Based Electronic Cognitive Therapy in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anna Marin, Renée DeCaro, Kylie Schiloski, Ala'a Elshaar, Brigid Dwyer, Ana Vives-Rodriguez, Rocco Palumbo, Katherine Turk, Andrew Budson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02521558 (Effectiveness of Home-based Electronic Cognitive Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02521558 naterminatednot on this map

Effectiveness of Home-based Electronic Cognitive Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston UniversityRan2015 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsMemory Disorders, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's DiseaseArmsIntervention Group, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna MarinCenter for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-6296
Renée DeCaroCenter for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2625-0633
Kylie SchiloskiCenter for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5697-2237
Ala'a ElshaarCenter for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7463-5795
Brigid DwyerDepartment of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6446-8054
Ana Vives-RodriguezCenter for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5672-8787
Rocco PalumboCenter for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-5840
Katherine TurkCenter for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6833-5494
Andrew BudsonCenter for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2913-0015
Boston University · USVA Boston Healthcare System · US

Funding

RL5: Research Education CoreP30AG072978 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Ann C. McKee · 2021 to 2026
$25.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCan home-based computerized cognitive training programs be a useful tool to sustain cognition and quality of life in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD)? To date, the progressive nature of the disease has made this question difficult to answer. Computerized platforms provide more accessibility to cognitive trainings; however, the feasibility of long-term, home-based computerized programs for patients with AD dementia remains unclear.

objectiveWe aimed to investigate the feasibility of a 24-week home-based intervention program using the Constant Therapy app and its preliminary efficacy on cognition in patients with AD. Constant Therapy is a program developed for patients with speech and cognitive deficits. We hypothesized that patients with AD would use Constant Therapy daily over the course of the 24-week period.

methodsData were collected over a 48-week period. We recruited participants aged between 50 and 90 years with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to AD or mild AD dementia. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Constant Therapy (n=10) or active control (n=9) group. The Constant Therapy group completed a tablet-based training during the first 24 weeks; the second 24 weeks of computerized training were optional. The active control group completed paper-and-pencil games during the first 24 weeks and were invited to complete an optional Constant Therapy training during the second 24 weeks. Every 6 weeks, the participants completed the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The participants independently accessed Constant Therapy using an Apple iPad. Our primary feasibility outcomes were the rate of adherence and daily use of Constant Therapy over 24 weeks. Our secondary outcomes were Constant Therapy performance over 24 weeks and change in RBANS scores between the 2 experimental groups.

resultsFeasibility analyses were computed for participants who completed 24 weeks of Constant Therapy. We found that long-term use of the Constant Therapy program was feasible in patients with AD over 24 weeks (adherence 80%; program use 121/168 days, for 32 minutes daily). These participants showed an overall improvement in accuracy and latency (P=.005) in the Constant Therapy scores, as well as specific improvements in visual and auditory memory, attention, and arithmetic tasks. The Constant Therapy group showed improvement in the RBANS coding subtest. No unexpected problems or adverse events were observed.

conclusionsLong-term (eg, 24 weeks) computerized cognitive training using Constant Therapy is feasible in patients with AD in the mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia stages. Patients adhered more to Constant Therapy than to the paper-and-pencil training over 24 weeks and improved their performance over time. These findings support the development of future randomized controlled trials that will investigate the efficacy of Constant Therapy to sustain cognitive function in patients with AD.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02521558; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02521558.

Indexed as

Alzheimer disease dementiacognitive trainingtechnology

Identifiers

PMID36094804
PMCPMC9513684
OpenAlexW4285030871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.