Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36094801›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2022

Implementing a Virtual Emergency Department: Qualitative Study Using the Normalization Process Theory.

Jennifer Shuldiner, Diya Srinivasan, Justin N Hall, Carl R May, Laura Desveaux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinician Experiences With Tele-Emergency Care: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer ShuldinerInstitute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2240-6274
Diya SrinivasanInstitute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3115-9167
Justin N HallDepartment of Emergency Services, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-9336
Carl R MayFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-2690
Laura DesveauxInstitute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-1865
Women's College Hospital · CALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 necessitated the rapid implementation and uptake of virtual health care; however, virtual care's potential role remains unclear in the urgent care setting. In December 2020, the first virtual emergency department (ED) in the Greater Toronto Area was piloted at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre by connecting patients to emergency physicians through an online portal.

objectiveThis study aims to understand whether and how ED physicians were able to integrate a virtual ED alongside in-person operations.

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with ED physicians guided by the Normalization Process Theory (NPT). The NPT provides a framework to understand how individuals and teams navigate the process of embedding new models of care as part of normal practice. All physicians who had worked within the virtual ED model were invited to participate. Data were analyzed using a combination of inductive and deductive techniques informed by the NPT.

resultsA total of 14 physicians were interviewed. Participant experiences were categorized into 1 of 2 groups: 1 group moved to normalize the virtual ED in practice, while the other described barriers to routine adoption. These groups differed in their perception of the patient benefits as well as the perceived role in the virtual ED. The group that normalized the virtual ED model saw value for patients (coherence) and was motivated by patient satisfaction witnessed (reflexive monitoring) at the end of the virtual appointment. By contrast, the other group did not find virtual ED work reflective of the perceived role of urgent care (cognitive participation) and felt their skills as ED physicians were underutilized. The limited ability to examine patients and a sense that patient issues were not fully resolved at the end of the virtual appointment caused frustration among the second group.

conclusionsAs further digital integration within the health care system occurs, it will be essential to support the evolution of staff skill sets to ensure physicians are satisfied with the care they are providing to their patients, while also ensuring the technology and process are efficient.

Indexed as

emergency departmentNormalization Process Theoryvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID36094801
PMCPMC9513685
OpenAlexW4289103713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.