Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36094660›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Prediction of placenta accreta spectrum by combining deep learning and radiomics using T2WI: a multicenter study.

Zhengjie Ye, Rongrong Xuan, Menglin Ouyang, Yutao Wang, Jian Xu, Wei Jin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Machine learning applications in placenta accreta spectrum disorders.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Review
  8. Looking back to look forward: Has the time arrived for active management of obstetricians in placenta accreta spectrum?International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhancing Automatic Placenta Analysis through Distributional Feature Recomposition in Vision-Language Contrastive Learning.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Machine learning and disease prediction in obstetrics.Current research in physiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhengjie Ye *Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Rongrong Xuan *Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315020, China.
Menglin OuyangAffiliated Hospital of Medical School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315020, China.
Yutao WangAffiliated Hospital of Medical School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315020, China.
Jian XuNingbo Women's and Children's Hospital, Ningbo, 315012, China.
Wei JinFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China. xyjw1969@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo achieve prenatal prediction of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) by combining clinical model, radiomics model, and deep learning model using T2-weighted images (T2WI), and to objectively evaluate the performance of the prediction through multicenter validation.

methodsA total of 407 pregnant women from two centers undergoing preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively recruited. The patients from institution I were divided into a training cohort (n = 298) and a validation cohort (n = 75), while patients from institution II served as the external test cohort (n = 34). In this study, we built a clinical prediction model using patient clinical data, a radiomics model based on selected key features, and a deep learning model by mining deep semantic features. Based on this, we developed a combined model by ensembling the prediction results of the three models mentioned above to achieve prenatal prediction of PAS. The performance of these predictive models was evaluated with respect to discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

resultsThe combined model achieved AUCs of 0.872 (95% confidence interval, 0.843 to 0.908) in the validation cohort and 0.857 (0.808 to 0.894) in the external test cohort, both of which outperformed the other models. The calibration curves demonstrated excellent consistency in the validation cohort and the external test cohort, and the decision curves indicated high clinical usefulness.

conclusionBy using preoperative clinical information and MRI images, the combined model can accurately predict PAS by ensembling clinical model, radiomics model, and deep learning model.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPlacenta AccretaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, StatisticalPregnancyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesDeep learningEnsemble learningMagnetic resonance imagingPlacenta accreta spectrumRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.