Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36094639›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2023

Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States.

Akshay Sharma, Monica Gandhi, Gregory Sallabank, Leland Merrill, Rob Stephenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akshay SharmaDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. akshaydr@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-5464
Monica GandhiDivision of HIV, Infectious Disease, and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
Gregory SallabankCenter for Sexuality and Health Disparities, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Leland MerrillCenter for Sexuality and Health Disparities, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Rob StephensonCenter for Sexuality and Health Disparities, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

Plugging Hair ARV Levels as Adherence Biomarkers into HIV Prevention TrialsR01AI098472 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GANDHI, MONICA · 2012 to 2021
$5.6M
Randomized Trial to Optimize Virologic Suppression Rates Using a Point-of-Care Urine Monitoring Assay (ROVING-PUMA)R01AI143340 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Monica Gandhi · 2018 to 2026
$5.6M
Acceptability and feasibility of self-collecting biological specimens among high-risk populationsR21AI136657 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GANDHI, MONICA, SHARMA, AKSHAY · 2018 to 2019
$444k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI098472NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI143340NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI136657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) have examined facilitators and barriers to self-collecting specimens for extragenital STI screening, and none have evaluated attitudes towards self-collecting hair samples that can be utilized for PrEP drug level testing to assess adherence. To address this gap, we interviewed 25 sexually active GBMSM who were offered a choice to self-collect and return finger-stick blood samples (for actual HIV testing), pharyngeal swabs, rectal swabs and urine specimens (for actual gonorrhea and chlamydia testing), and hair samples (to visually determine their adequacy for PrEP drug level testing): 11 who returned all, 4 who returned some, and 10 who did not return any. Participants found self-collecting finger-stick blood samples and rectal swabs more challenging than other specimens. Frequently discussed facilitators of return included an opportunity to confirm one's HIV or STI status, limited access to a healthcare provider and a desire to advance research focusing on home-based testing. Commonly cited barriers to return included low self-efficacy pertaining to self-collection and apprehension around the possibility of delay or loss of specimens during transit. Offering additional support such as real-time video conferencing may prove helpful in future field-based research with GBMSM.

Indexed as

GonorrheaHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorUnited StatesHIVPre-exposure ProphylaxisSelf-testingSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted Diseases

Identifiers

PMID36094639
PMCPMC9466335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.