Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36094369›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

DNA passes through cohesin's hinge as well as its Smc3-kleisin interface.

James E Collier, Kim A Nasmyth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. In through the out door: A loop-binding-first model for topological cohesin loading.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cohesin regulation and roles in chromosome structure and function.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024
    Review
  14. Mechanical disengagement of the cohesin ring.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Structural biology of SMC complexes across the tree of life.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023
    Review
  18. DNA segment capture by Smc5/6 holocomplexes.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James E CollierDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9904-9423
Kim A NasmythDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7030-4403
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 26747Wellcome Trust 107935/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ring model proposes that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by co-entrapment of sister DNAs inside a single tripartite cohesin ring. The model explains how Scc1 cleavage triggers anaphase but has hitherto only been rigorously tested using small circular mini-chromosomes in yeast, where covalently circularizing the ring by crosslinking its three interfaces induces catenation of individual and sister DNAs. If the model applies to real chromatids, then the ring must have a DNA entry gate essential for mitosis. Whether this is situated at the Smc3/Scc1 or Smc1/Smc3 hinge interface is an open question. We have previously demonstrated DNA entrapment by cohesin in vitro (Collier et al., 2020). Here we show that cohesin in fact possesses two DNA gates, one at the Smc3/Scc1 interface and a second at the Smc1/3 hinge. Unlike the Smc3/Scc1 interface, passage of DNAs through SMC hinges depends on both Scc2 and Scc3, a pair of regulatory subunits necessary for entrapment in vivo. This property together with the lethality caused by locking this interface but not that between Smc3 and Scc1 in vivo suggests that passage of DNAs through the hinge is essential for building sister chromatid cohesion. Passage of DNAs through the Smc3/Scc1 interface is necessary for cohesin's separase-independent release from chromosomes and may therefore largely serve as an exit gate.

Indexed as

ChromatidsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNASaccharomyces cerevisiaeCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNASaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSCC2 protein, S cerevisiaeSMC3 protein, S cerevisiaebiochemistrychemical biologycohesincondensinS. cerevisiaeSMC

Identifiers

PMID36094369
PMCPMC9467508
OpenAlexW4295242589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.