Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36094367›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2022

Effect of single end-range and not end-range Maitland mobilization on pressure pain threshold and functional measures in knee osteoarthritis: randomised, controlled clinical trial.

Miklós Pozsgai, Kyra Udvarácz, Iván A Péter, Péter Than, Nóra Nusser

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06751095 (Effects Of Maitland's Mobilization At Mid Versus End Range On Pain, Range Of Motion And Functional Disability In Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06751095 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects Of Maitland's Mobilization At Mid Versus End Range On Pain, Range Of Motion And Functional Disability In Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled44ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsMaitland's Mobilization in End range, Maitland's mobilization in Mid range
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miklós PozsgaiDepartment of Balneology, Harkány Termal Rehabilitation Centre, Harkány, Hungary - miklos.pozsgay@gmail.com.
Kyra UdvaráczFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Iván A PéterDepartment of Balneology, Harkány Termal Rehabilitation Centre, Harkány, Hungary.
Péter ThanMedical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Nóra NusserDepartment of Balneology, Harkány Termal Rehabilitation Centre, Harkány, Hungary.
University of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyperalgesia is attributed to peripheral and central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is a relevant method for evaluating pain sensitivity in knee OA. The effect of end-range and not end-range Maitland mobilization for certain time-period on pain sensitivity has not been investigated in knee OA.

aimThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of end-range and not end-range Maitland mobilization compared to sham manual therapy technique on PPT and functional measures.

designRandomised, controlled clinical trial.

settingOutpatient setting. POPULATION: Sixty-six patients with mild-to-severe knee OA.

methodsTwenty-one patients (N.=21) received end-range Maitland mobilization (EMGr), twenty patients (N.=20) received not end-range Maitland mobilization (nEMGr) and twenty-two patients (N.=22) received sham manual therapy technique (CG). All interventions were performed once. Evaluation was conducted pre-, postintervention and on the following consecutive second days within a 6-day period. Outcomes were local and distant PPT, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and strength of passive resistance of knee at onset of pain.

resultsLocal and distant PPT increased, TUG time and strength of passive resistance decreased immediately, local and distant PPT remained decreased in 6-day and 4-day period, TUG time remained decreased in 6-day period in EMGr (all changes P≤0.017). Local PPT increased immediately compared to baseline in nEMGr. In between group comparison, increase of local, distant PPT and strength of passive resistance endures on 2

conclusionsSingle end-range Maitland mobilization is effective immediately and in 4-day period on pain sensitization and immediately on physical function compared to not end-range Maitland mobilization and sham manual therapy technique in knee OA. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Based on the present results, applying end-range Maitland mobilization is suggested on every second day to maintain alleviation of pain sensitization and increasing passive knee joint mobility effectively in knee OA.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansPainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPostural BalanceRange of Motion, ArticularTime and Motion StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36094367
PMCPMC10019481
OpenAlexW4295286819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.