Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36094175›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2022

Dot-Blotting: A Quick Method for Expression Analysis of Recombinant Proteins.

Vibhor Mishra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SuppressedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Lambda-evo (λApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vibhor MishraSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
American Lebanese Syrian Associated CharitiesComprehensive Cancer Center 5P30CA021765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NIH HHSSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expressing recombinant proteins in heterologous host cells is a prerequisite for purification and other downstream processes. Cell cultures require a protein expression test to optimize incubation time, temperature, and additives (like chemical inducers) to identify the best growth conditions with maximum recombinant protein yield. However, running SDS-PAGE followed by western blotting is cumbersome and results are not quick. Here, I describe a simple protocol to quickly check the presence of recombinant protein in cell cultures using a dot-blot experiment. The cells can be rapidly lysed and directly spotted on the nitrocellulose membrane. Then, the membrane is incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated antibody raised against the affinity tag present on the recombinant protein to confirm the protein expression by chemiluminescence. It takes less than an hour to get results. This method rapidly investigates recombinant protein expression in different cell lines and tests other variables. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Protein expression analysis for eukaryotic systems Basic Protocol 2: Protein expression analysis for bacterial systems.

Indexed as

Recombinant ProteinsBlotting, WesternCollodionHorseradish PeroxidaseImmunoblottingCollodionHorseradish PeroxidaseRecombinant Proteinsdot-blotnitrocelluloseprotein expressionpurificationrecombinant proteinwestern blotting

Identifiers

PMID36094175
PMCPMC9473290
OpenAlexW4295514736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.