Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36093755›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2023

Lessons learned from co-designing a high school beach safety education program with lifeguards and students.

William Koon, Robert W Brander, Dennis Alonzo, Amy E Peden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Provision of basic swimming and water safety skills in low-resource environments: barriers and facilitators of use of WHO practical guidance.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2026
    Article
  4. Public Health Promotion Through Language Learning: Improving Migrants' Australian Beach Safety Knowledge Through a Reading Exercise for English Language Proficiency Tests.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Preparing to Play With Fire: Exploring Bushfire Preparedness and Risk Communication Among University Students in Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lessons learned from co-designing a high school beach safety education program with lifeguards and students.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William KoonUNSW Beach Safety Research Group, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-4347
Robert W BranderUNSW Beach Safety Research Group, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7268-2587
Dennis AlonzoUNSW Beach Safety Research Group, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-497X
Amy E PedenUNSW Beach Safety Research Group, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6424-1511

Funding

Lake Macquarie City CouncilUNSW Science Industry Network Seed Fund RG210654UNSW Science Industry Network Seed Fund RG210655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedSchool-based beach safety education programs are common, but best practice guidance and information on their design and development is limited.

methodsResearchers, professional ocean lifeguards and students participated in a co-design process to inform a lifeguard-delivered, school-based beach safety education program for a coastal community in New South Wales, Australia. Lifeguards and researchers (experts) provided structured feedback about the program in a survey and facilitated workshop; students (n = 26) aged 11 to 13 years participated in focus group sessions intended to garner in-depth understanding of their experiences at the beach and knowledge of, and attitudes towards, beach safety. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The co-design process provided a novel and inclusive model for beach safety education program development, and valuable lessons for future efforts. Specifically, student focus groups identified several facets of pre-teens and younger teenagers' beach experience that prompted revision of the education program, primarily framing of program content and safety messages. Peers are a primary motivator for this age group and students' burgeoning independence emerged as an important theme. While knowledgeable about beach hazards and risks, students conveyed mixed safety attitudes and self-reported safety practices, highlighting the importance of designing programs to motivate behaviour and promote safe decision-making vs raising awareness alone. Findings illustrate the value of adopting co-design processes for all beach safety programs, school or otherwise. SO WHAT?: Beach safety programs may not be delivering information that is needed, wanted or useful. Structured consultation with the priority population must become standard practice in beach safety and drowning prevention education program development.

Indexed as

DrowningAdolescentAustraliaChildHumansProgram DevelopmentSchoolsStudentsadolescencebeach safetycoastalco-designdrowningriskwater safety

Identifiers

PMID36093755
PMCPMC10087910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.