Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36093581›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2023

Urine biomarkers enable pancreatic cancer detection up to 2 years before diagnosis.

Silvana Debernardi, Oleg Blyuss, Daria Rycyk, Kirtiman Srivastava, Christie Y Jeon, Hui Cai, Qiuyin Cai, Xiao-Ou Shu, Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04449406 (Early Detection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04449406 active not recruitingnot on this map

Early Detection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Using a Panel of Biomarkers (UroPanc)

TypeobservationalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan2020 to 2026Enrolled3,500ConditionsPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic Risk Prediction Models for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review: Detection of Cancer Biomarkers from a Clinical Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Challenges of early detection of pancreatic cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvana DebernardiCentre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Oleg BlyussCentre for Prevention, Detection and Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0194-6389
Daria RycykCentre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Kirtiman SrivastavaCentre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Christie Y JeonDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5739-2477
Hui CaiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Qiuyin CaiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Xiao-Ou ShuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Tatjana Crnogorac-JurcevicCentre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2465-5605
Queen Mary University of London · GBVanderbilt University · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI STACIE B DUSETZINA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Southern Community Cohort StudyU01CA202979 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BLOT, WILLIAM J., SHRUBSOLE, MARTHA J. · 2016 to 2025
$22.0M
Shanghai Womens Health StudyUM1CA182910 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2014 to 2018
$5.9M
Shanghai Men's Health StudyUM1CA173640 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
Cancer Research UK 26239Cancer Research UK A26239NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS U01 CA202979NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA173640NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is mainly attributed to late diagnosis. We assessed the predictive performance of our previously reported urine biomarker panel for earlier detection of PDAC (LYVE1, REG1B and TFF1) in prediagnostic samples, alone and in combination with plasma CA19-9. This nested case-control study included 99 PDAC cases with urine samples prospectively collected up to 5 years prior to PDAC diagnosis and 198 matched controls. The samples were obtained from the Shanghai Women's Health Study (SWHS), the Shanghai Men's Health Studies (SMHS) and the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS). The urine biomarkers were measured by ELISA. Plasma CA19-9 was quantified by Luminex. Multiple logistic regression and Wilcoxon rank-sum and Mann-Whitney test were used for analysis. The internal validation approach was applied and the validated AUC estimators are reported on. The algorithm of urinary protein panel, urine creatinine and age named PancRISK, displayed similar AUC as CA19-9 up to 1 year before PDAC diagnosis (AUC = 0.79); however, the combination enhanced the AUCs to 0.89, and showed good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.77) up to 2 years. The combination showed sensitivity (SN) of 72% at 90% specificity (SP), and SP of 59% at 90% SN up to 1 year and 60% SN with 80% SP and 53% SP with 80% SN up to 2 years before PDAC diagnosis. Adding the clinical information on BMI value resulted in the overall improvement in performance of the PancRISK score. When combined with CA19-9, the urinary panel reached a workable model for detecting PDAC cases up to 2 years prior to diagnosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCase-Control StudiesChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 Antigenearly detectionpancreatic cancerprediagnostic samplesurine biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36093581
PMCPMC9789171
OpenAlexW4295235087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.