Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36093511›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

Prognostic factors in Japanese men with high-Gleason metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Mitsuhisa Nishimoto, Kazutoshi Fujita, Yutaka Yamamoto, Mamoru Hashimoto, Shogo Adomi, Eri Banno, Yoshitaka Saito, Nobutaka Shimizu, Yasunori Mori, Takafumi Minami and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mitsuhisa NishimotoDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Yutaka YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Japan.
Mamoru HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Shogo AdomiDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Eri BannoDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Yoshitaka SaitoDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Nobutaka ShimizuDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Yasunori MoriDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Takafumi MinamiDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Masahiro NozawaDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Kazuhiro NoseDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Akihide HirayamaDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Japan.
Kazuhiro YoshimuraDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Hirotsugu UemuraDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Kindai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several therapeutic agents are available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, prognosis is still not well developed. The Gleason score (GS) is a prognostic factor available for patients with metastatic CRPC. GSs ranging from 6 to 10 and GSs ≥8 are usually categorized as single prognostic factors. In this study, we evaluated the prognosis of high-GS metastatic CRPC in Japanese men. Methods: Overall, 105 patients with metastatic CRPC with a GS ≥8 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate analyses of patient age, GS, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) were performed using Cox proportional hazards analysis to predict overall survival (OS). Results: GS 8 had all Gleason patterns of 4+4. Thirty patients (28.6%) had GS of 8, and 75 (71.4%) had GS of 9 or 10. As a first-line treatment for metastatic CRPC, 42 patients (40%) received abiraterone, 35 (33.3%) received enzalutamide, and 26 (24.8%) received docetaxel. The 5-year OS in patients with GS of 8 was 65.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 43.07-86.82%], while the 5-year OS in patients with GS of 9 or 10 was 37.0% (95% CI: 24.41-56.11%). There was a significant difference in OS between the GS 8 and GS 9-10 groups (log-rank test, P=0.038). Multivariate analysis showed that GS and ECOG-PS were significant prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic CRPC with GS 9-10 had poor prognoses, suggesting the need for additional treatment options.

Indexed as

Gleason score (GS)high-volume mCRPCoverall survival (OS)taxane

Identifiers

PMID36093511
PMCPMC9459578
OpenAlexW4285528200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.