Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36093498›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Detection and Analysis of Human Cells Based on Artificial Neural Network.

Jun Yao, Hongji Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun YaoCollege of Computer Information and Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330044, China.
Hongji YuanCollege of Computer Information and Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330044, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6383-5361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection and classification of histopathological cell images is a hot topic in current research. Medical images are an important research direction and are widely used in computer-aided diagnosis, biological research, and other fields. A neural network model based on deep learning is also common in medical image analysis and automatic detection and classification of tissue and cell images. Current medical cell detection methods generally do not consider that the yield is affected by other factors in the topological region, which leads to inevitable errors in the accuracy and generalization of the algorithm; at the same time, the current medical cell imaging methods are too simple to predict the classification markers, which affect the accuracy of cell image classification. This study introduces the concepts of two kinds of neural networks and then constructs a cell recognition model based on the convolution neural network principle and staining principle. In the experimental part, we developed three groups of experiments using the same equation as the experiment and tested the best cell recognition model proposed in this study.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumans

Identifiers

PMID36093498
PMCPMC9452942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.