Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36093418›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022

Deep attention super-resolution of brain magnetic resonance images acquired under clinical protocols.

Bryan M Li, Leonardo V Castorina, Maria Del C Valdés Hernández, Una Clancy, Stewart J Wiseman, Eleni Sakka, Amos J Storkey, Daniela Jaime Garcia, Yajun Cheng, Fergus Doubal and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. WCCAN: Windowed Cross-contrast Attention Network for Multi-contrast Brain MR Image Super-resolution.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bryan M LiSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Leonardo V CastorinaSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Maria Del C Valdés HernándezCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Una ClancyCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Stewart J WisemanCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Eleni SakkaCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Amos J StorkeySchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Daniela Jaime GarciaCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Yajun ChengCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Fergus DoubalCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Michael T ThrippletonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Michael StringerCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Joanna M WardlawCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vast quantities of Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) are routinely acquired in clinical practice but, to speed up acquisition, these scans are typically of a quality that is sufficient for clinical diagnosis but sub-optimal for large-scale precision medicine, computational diagnostics, and large-scale neuroimaging collaborative research. Here, we present a critic-guided framework to upsample low-resolution (often 2D) MRI full scans to help overcome these limitations. We incorporate feature-importance and self-attention methods into our model to improve the interpretability of this study. We evaluate our framework on paired low- and high-resolution brain MRI structural full scans (i.e., T1-, T2-weighted, and FLAIR sequences are simultaneously input) obtained in clinical and research settings from scanners manufactured by Siemens, Phillips, and GE. We show that the upsampled MRIs are qualitatively faithful to the ground-truth high-quality scans (PSNR = 35.39; MAE = 3.78E-3; NMSE = 4.32E-10; SSIM = 0.9852; mean normal-appearing gray/white matter ratio intensity differences ranging from 0.0363 to 0.0784 for FLAIR, from 0.0010 to 0.0138 for T1-weighted and from 0.0156 to 0.074 for T2-weighted sequences). The automatic raw segmentation of tissues and lesions using the super-resolved images has fewer false positives and higher accuracy than those obtained from interpolated images in protocols represented with more than three sets in the training sample, making our approach a strong candidate for practical application in clinical and collaborative research.

Indexed as

brain imagingdeep learningexplainable artificial intelligencegenerative adversarial networksimage reconstructionMagnetic Resonance Imagingsuper-resolutionU-Net

Identifiers

PMID36093418
PMCPMC9458316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.