Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36093256›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2022

Nanomaterials and hybrid nanocomposites for CO

Tawfik A Saleh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Heteroatom-Engineered Covalent Organic Frameworks Break the COJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. BSA-modified g-CNanoscale advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chemical CORSC advances · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Nanomaterials Toward CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Enhanced COScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  15. Copper-doped ZnO-ZrORoyal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Effects of CORSC advances · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tawfik A SalehChemistry Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Dhahran 31261 Saudi Arabia tawfik@kfupm.edu.sa tawfikas@hotmail.com https://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/CHEM/tawfik/publications.html.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3037-5159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO

Identifiers

PMID36093256
PMCPMC9400618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.