Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36093220›Full record

ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2022

Primary care nurses during the coronavirus disaster and their struggle: Qualitative research.

Junki Mizumoto, Toshichika Mitsuyama, Shinichiro Kumagaya, Masato Eto, Masashi Izumiya, Shoko Horita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junki MizumotoDepartment of Medical Education Studies, Graduate School of Medicine, International Research Center for Medical Education The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-7351
Toshichika MitsuyamaDepartment of Medical Education Studies, Graduate School of Medicine, International Research Center for Medical Education The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1504-7106
Shinichiro KumagayaTojisha-Kenkyu Department, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2797-9426
Masato EtoDepartment of Medical Education Studies, Graduate School of Medicine, International Research Center for Medical Education The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-3431
Masashi IzumiyaDepartment of Medical Education Studies, Graduate School of Medicine, International Research Center for Medical Education The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4794-4418
Shoko HoritaDepartment of Medical Education Studies, Graduate School of Medicine, International Research Center for Medical Education The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-3605
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has substantially affected the health and lives of medical professionals. However, the experiences of nurses engaged in primary care remain unclear. We explored how nurses working in primary care were psychologically and socially affected by the COVID-19 disaster and how they overcame the difficulties experienced. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of seven Japanese nurses working in primary care. Data collection was performed before, during, and after a workshop based on the Tojisha-Kenkyu (user-led research) framework to explore how the COVID-19 disaster affected the nurses and how they coped. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Three themes emerged from the analysis: effects of the COVID-19 disaster on nurses, nurses' newly found strength during the pandemic, and their changes and achievements through the Tojisha-Kenkyu framework. The first theme comprised four subthemes: fear of the unknown; difficulty in adaptation; dysfunction in patient care; and defilement and oppression. The second theme involved feeling in control and professionalism. The third theme, which was based on participants' discovery of "same and different" fellowships, showed work reconstruction and self-understanding, which alleviated their difficulties. Conclusions: The effect of the pandemic on nurses working in primary care ranges from work-related frustration to daily life issues. The Tojisha-Kenkyu method can help nurses to alleviate difficulties. Further research should be conducted to elucidate the constant burden on primary care professionals and establish appropriate occupational and daily life support during pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID‐19family medicineoccupational stressprimary care nursingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36093220
PMCPMC9444012
OpenAlexW4283775901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.