ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06030115 (Effects of a Physical Therapist-driven Individualized Hybrid Model of the Exercise Component of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Patient Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of a Physical Therapist-driven Individualized Hybrid Model of the Exercise Component of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Patient Outcomes: a Prospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of Field Tests for Predicting Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Prescribing Exercise Intensity in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Less fear, better function: the impact of minimally invasive cardiac surgery on kinesiophobia and functional capacity compared to median sternotomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Early-Phase Exercise-Based Comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Program after Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Intra- and Inter-Rater Reproducibility of Measures of Physical Performance in Patients with COPD.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Data-Driven Design and Additive Manufacturing of Patient-Specific Lattice Titanium Scaffolds for Mandibular Bone Reconstruction.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Assessment of frailty in patients with heart failure: A new Heart Failure Frailty Score developed by Delphi consensus.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Development and validation of clinical prediction models for cardiorespiratory fitness in atrial fibrillation patients following radiofrequency catheter ablation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Five-repetition sit-to-stand test validation in adolescents and adults with intellectual disabilities.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Assessing Static Balance, Balance Confidence, and Fall Rate in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comprehensive Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sit-to-stand test as a complementary assessment in patients with cardiovascular disease.Revista CuidarteArticle
- Associations between anthropometric measures and cardiovascular risk biomarkers in women with short stature.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sit-To-Stand (STS) tests are reported as feasible alternatives for the assessment of functional fitness but the reliability of these tests in people with coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been reported. This study explored the test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity of the five times, 30-sec and 1-min sit-to-stand test (FTSTS test, 30-s STS test and 1-min STS test respectively) in patients with CAD. The feasibility of applying these tests to distinguish the level of risk for cardiovascular events in CAD patients was also investigated. Methods: Patients with stable CAD performed a 6MWT and 3 STS tests in random order on the same day. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted using STS test data to differentiate patients with low or high risk of cardiovascular events based on the risk level determined by distance covered in the 6MWT as > or ≤ 419 m. Thirty patients repeated the 3 STS tests on the following day. Results: 112 subjects with diagnoses of atherosclerosis or post-percutaneous coronary intervention, or post-acute myocardial infarction (post-AMI) participated in the validity analysis. All 3 STS tests demonstrated moderate and significant correlation with the 6MWT (coefficient values Conclusions: All STS tests demonstrated good test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity. STS tests may discriminate low from high levels of risk for a cardiovascular event in patients with CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.