Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092888›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Exploring the optimal strategy of imputation from SNP array to whole-genome sequencing data in farm animals.

Yifan Jiang, Hailiang Song, Hongding Gao, Qin Zhang, Xiangdong Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yifan JiangNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Hailiang SongBeijing Key Laboratory of Fisheries Biotechnology, Fisheries Science Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hongding GaoNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland.
Qin ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.
Xiangdong DingNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype imputation from BeadChip to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data is a cost-effective method of obtaining genotypes of WGS variants. Beagle, one of the most popular imputation software programs, has been widely used for genotype inference in humans and non-human species. A few studies have systematically and comprehensively compared the performance of beagle versions and parameter settings of farm animals. Here, we investigated the imputation performance of three representative versions of Beagle (Beagle 4.1, Beagle 5.0, and Beagle 5.4), and the effective population size (Ne) parameter setting for three species (cattle, pig, and chicken). Six scenarios were investigated to explore the impact of certain key factors on imputation performance. The results showed that the default Ne (1,000,000) is not suitable for livestock and poultry in small reference or low-density arrays of target panels, with 2.47%-10.45% drops in accuracy. Beagle 5 significantly reduced the computation time (4.66-fold-13.24-fold) without an accuracy loss. In addition, using a large combined-reference panel or high-density chip provides greater imputation accuracy, especially for low minor allele frequency (MAF) variants. Finally, a highly significant correlation in the measures of imputation accuracy can be obtained with an MAF equal to or greater than 0.05.

Indexed as

accuracyimputationlivestockpoultrywhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36092888
PMCPMC9459117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.