Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092883›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Barriers to hydroxyurea use from the perspectives of providers, individuals with sickle cell disease, and families: Report from a U.S. regional collaborative.

Marsha J Treadwell, Lisa Du, Neha Bhasin, Anne M Marsh, Theodore Wun, M A Bender, Trisha E Wong, Nicole Crook, Jong H Chung, Shannon Norman and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hydroxyurea in the sickle cell disease modern era.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Marsha J TreadwellDivision of Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Lisa DuUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, CA, United States.
Neha BhasinDivision of Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Anne M MarshDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States.
Theodore WunDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
M A BenderOdessa Brown Children's Clinic, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States.
Trisha E WongDivision of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology and Department of Pathology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, United States.
Nicole CrookCenter for Inherited Blood Disorders, Orange, CA, United States.
Jong H ChungHematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Shannon NormanAlaska Bleeding Disorders Clinic, Anchorage, AK, United States.
Nicolas CamiloSt. Luke's Children's Cancer Institute, Boise, ID, United States.
Judith CavazosUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, CA, United States.
Diane NugentCenter for Inherited Blood Disorders, Orange, CA, United States.
Center for Inherited Blood Disorders · USUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USAlaska Neurology Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder that affects about 100,000 people in the U.S., primarily Blacks/African-Americans. A multitude of complications negatively impacts quality of life. Hydroxyurea has been FDA approved since 1998 as a disease-modifying therapy for SCD, but is underutilized. Negative and uninformed perceptions of hydroxyurea and barriers to its use hinder adherence and promotion of the medication. As the largest real-world study to date that assessed hydroxyurea use for children and adults with SCD, we gathered and analyzed perspectives of providers, individuals with SCD, and families. Participants provided information about socio-demographics, hospital and emergency admissions for pain, number of severe pain episodes interfering with daily activities, medication adherence, and barriers to hydroxyurea. Providers reported on indications for hydroxyurea, reasons not prescribed, and current laboratory values. We found that hydroxyurea use was reported in over half of eligible patients from this large geographic region in the U.S., representing a range of sickle cell specialty clinical settings and practices. Provider and patient/caregiver reports about hydroxyurea use were consistent with one another; adults 26 years and older were least likely to be on hydroxyurea; and the likelihood of being on hydroxyurea decreased with one or more barriers. Using the intentional and unintentional medication nonadherence framework, we found that, even for patients on hydroxyurea, challenges to taking the medicine at the right time and forgetting were crucial unintentional barriers to adherence. Intentional barriers such as worry about side effects and "tried and it did not work" were important barriers for young adults and adults. For providers, diagnoses other than HgbSS or HgbS-β0 thalassemia were associated with lower odds of prescribing, consistent with evidence-based guidelines. Our results support strengthening provider understanding and confidence in implementing existing SCD guidelines, and the importance of shared decision making. Our findings can assist providers in understanding choices and decisions of families; guide individualized clinical discussions regarding hydroxyurea therapy; and help with developing tailored interventions to address barriers. Addressing barriers to hydroxyurea use can inform strategies to minimize similar barriers in the use of emerging and combination therapies for SCD.

Indexed as

barriers to adherencedisease modifying therapieshydroxyureamodels -adherencesickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID36092883
PMCPMC9461276
OpenAlexW4293175945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.